Hello Nicolas
Thanks your comment.
A pause is common state for media player, but our VPU could trigger an interrupt regardless of a player state.
So at a pause state if a power turns off, our driver becomes hang-up.
I think power on/off should be controlled in the open/close function.
Thanks.
> Le lundi 19 février 2024 à 04:04 +0000, jackson.lee a écrit :
> > Hi Nicolas
> >
> >
> > > This seems very unnatural. We do the get() in "start_streaming()",
> > > but the
> > > put() is only done when the device is closed, or when the driver is
> > > removed. As this is not balanced, you seem to have to check the
> > > suspended condition all over the place.
> > >
> > > I think we could aim for start_streaming()/stop_streaming() for your
> > > get/put placement. At least they will be bound to an entirely balanced
> API.
> > > But then, a media player in paused sate will prevent that device
> > > from being suspended.
> > >
> > > If the HW is capable of preserving enough state, and From the short
> > > doc I have it gives me the impression it can preserve that, I'd
> > > suggest to follow what hantro driver is doing. What is does is that
> > > it will do get() in device_run(), and put() whenever the job
> > > completes. This driver has been designed so when there is no job, it
> > > means the firmware is currently idle and looking for more work. So
> > > it seems like the perfect moment to do suspend it.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks your comment,
> >
> > Currently they are not balanced,
> > If we puts "the put functon" into the stop_streaming, our hw is stalled
> until doing wake-up command, so our v4l2 device become block.
> > so I'd like to update the below instead of calling get at the
> start_streaming function.
> >
> >
> > @@ -1867,6 +1868,13 @@ static int wave5_vpu_open_dec(struct file
> > *filp)
> >
> > wave5_vdi_allocate_sram(inst->dev);
> >
> > + err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(inst->dev->dev);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(inst->dev->dev, "decoder runtime resume
> failed %d\n", err);
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto cleanup_inst;
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
>
> I guess we need to discuss the power management strategy for this device.
> If you do resume_and_get() in open(), and then put in close(), that seems
> balanced. But in term of power saving, it might not be very strong. If you
> have a media player that is set to pause and then placed in the background,
> you still keep the IP running. This is extremely common, since application
> cannot close their device without loosing the reference frames, and thus
> having to do extra work on resume to seek back to the previous sync point
> and drop unneeded frames.
>
> It seems like the whole point of asking the firmware to save the state and
> suspend is to be able to do so while there is meaningful sate in the firt
> place.
> If we are to suspend only when there is no meaningful state, we could just
> free all resources and power it off completely. (This is just for
> illustration, its probably to slow to boot the firmware at runtime)
>
>
> I understand you suffered lockup with a start_streaming() for
> resume_and_get(), and stop_streaming() for put(), this may simply indicate
> that some hardware access are needed between these two. Can you write down
> a power management plan that would effectively save power in common use
> cases ? We can certainly help in refactoring the code to make that happen.
>
> Nicolas
>
> >
> > > Le mercredi 31 janvier 2024 à 10:30 +0900, jackson.lee a écrit :
> > > > There are two device run-time PM callbacks defined in 'struct
> > > dev_pm_ops'
> > > > int (*runtime_suspend)(struct device *dev); int
> > > > (*runtime_resume)(struct device *dev);
> > >
> > > I wonder how useful is it to teach everyone what the generic 'struct
> > > dev_pm_ops'
> > > contains. Perhaps you simply wanted that this patch implement both
> > > suspend and resume ops ?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jackson Lee <jackson.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nas Chung <nas.chung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c | 5 +-
> > > > .../chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-dec.c | 9 +++
> > > > .../chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c | 9 +++
> > > > .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c | 68
> +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > .../platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpuapi.c | 7 ++
> > > > .../media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5.h | 3 +
> > > > 6 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> > > > index 8ad7f3a28ae1..8aade5a38439 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-hw.c
> > > > @@ -503,6 +503,7 @@ int wave5_vpu_build_up_dec_param(struct
> > > > vpu_instance
> > > *inst,
> > > > /* This register must be reset explicitly */
> > > > vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_EXT_ADDR, 0);
> > > > vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_NUM_CQ_DEPTH_M1,
> > > > (COMMAND_QUEUE_DEPTH - 1));
> > > > + vpu_write_reg(inst->dev, W5_CMD_ERR_CONCEAL, 0);
> > >
> > > In some way, the relation between suspend and this register write is
> > > not obvious. If its not related, please do this in its own patch.
> > > Otherwise you want to explain why you needed this (possibly just in
> > > the commit message).
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ret = send_firmware_command(inst, W5_CREATE_INSTANCE, true,
> > > > NULL,
> > > NULL);
> > > > if (ret) {
> > > > @@ -1075,8 +1076,8 @@ int wave5_vpu_re_init(struct device *dev, u8
> > > > *fw,
> > > size_t size)
> > > > return setup_wave5_properties(dev); }
> > > >
> > > > -static int wave5_vpu_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool
> > > > i_sleep_wake,
> > > const uint16_t *code,
> > > > - size_t size)
> > > > +int wave5_vpu_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool i_sleep_wake,
> > > > +const
> > > uint16_t *code,
> > > > + size_t size)
> > > > {
> > > > u32 reg_val;
> > > > struct vpu_buf *common_vb;
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-dec.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-dec.c
> > > > index ef227af72348..328a7a8f26c5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-dec.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-dec.c
> > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > > > * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 CHIPS&MEDIA INC
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > > #include "wave5-helper.h"
> > > >
> > > > #define VPU_DEC_DEV_NAME "C&M Wave5 VPU decoder"
> > > > @@ -1387,9 +1388,17 @@ static int
> > > > wave5_vpu_dec_start_streaming(struct
> > > > vb2_queue *q, unsigned int count
> > > >
> > > > if (q->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE && inst-
> >state
> > > > ==
> > > VPU_INST_STATE_NONE) {
> > > > struct dec_open_param open_param;
> > > > + int err = 0;
> > > >
> > > > memset(&open_param, 0, sizeof(struct dec_open_param));
> > > >
> > > > + err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(inst->dev->dev);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(inst->dev->dev, "decoder runtime resume
> > > failed %d\n", err);
> > > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + goto return_buffers;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > ret = wave5_vpu_dec_allocate_ring_buffer(inst);
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > goto return_buffers;
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
> > > > index 761775216cd4..ff73d69de41c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
> > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > > > * Copyright (C) 2021-2023 CHIPS&MEDIA INC
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > > #include "wave5-helper.h"
> > > >
> > > > #define VPU_ENC_DEV_NAME "C&M Wave5 VPU encoder"
> > > > @@ -1387,9 +1388,17 @@ static int
> > > > wave5_vpu_enc_start_streaming(struct
> > > > vb2_queue *q, unsigned int count
> > > >
> > > > if (inst->state == VPU_INST_STATE_NONE && q->type ==
> > > V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE) {
> > > > struct enc_open_param open_param;
> > > > + int err = 0;
> > > >
> > > > memset(&open_param, 0, sizeof(struct enc_open_param));
> > > >
> > > > + err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(inst->dev->dev);
> > > > + if (err) {
> > > > + dev_err(inst->dev->dev, "encoder runtime resume
> > > failed %d\n", err);
> > > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + goto return_buffers;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > wave5_set_enc_openparam(&open_param, inst);
> > > >
> > > > ret = wave5_vpu_enc_open(inst, &open_param); diff --
> git
> > > > a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> > > > index 0d90b5820bef..f81409740a56 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu.c
> > > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > > > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > > > #include <linux/firmware.h>
> > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > > #include "wave5-vpu.h"
> > > > #include "wave5-regdefine.h"
> > > > #include "wave5-vpuconfig.h"
> > > > @@ -117,6 +118,65 @@ static int wave5_vpu_load_firmware(struct
> > > > device
> > > *dev, const char *fw_name,
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static __maybe_unused int wave5_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) {
> > > > + struct vpu_device *vpu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + wave5_vpu_sleep_wake(dev, true, NULL, 0);
> > > > + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(vpu->num_clks, vpu->clks);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __maybe_unused int wave5_pm_resume(struct device *dev) {
> > > > + struct vpu_device *vpu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > + int ret = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + wave5_vpu_sleep_wake(dev, false, NULL, 0);
> > > > + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(vpu->num_clks, vpu->clks);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "Enabling clocks, fail: %d\n", ret);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __maybe_unused int wave5_suspend(struct device *dev) {
> > > > + struct vpu_device *vpu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > + struct vpu_instance *inst;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(inst, &vpu->instances, list)
> > > > + v4l2_m2m_suspend(inst->v4l2_m2m_dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + return pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev); }
> > > > +
> > > > +static __maybe_unused int wave5_resume(struct device *dev) {
> > > > + struct vpu_device *vpu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > + struct vpu_instance *inst;
> > > > + int ret = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
> > > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry(inst, &vpu->instances, list)
> > > > + v4l2_m2m_resume(inst->v4l2_m2m_dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > The functions wave5_suspend() and wave5_resume() are not just
> > > "maybe_unsued" but actually never used. What was the intention ?
> > > Considering the usage of __maybe_unused has been such a bad friend
> > > for this one, could you instead bracket the functions with an
> explicit ?
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > This way the compiler will have a word if you implement something
> > > that you forgot to actually use.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct dev_pm_ops wave5_pm_ops = {
> > > > + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(wave5_pm_suspend, wave5_pm_resume,
> NULL) };
> > > > +
> > > > static int wave5_vpu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > > > int ret;
> > > > @@ -232,6 +292,10 @@ static int wave5_vpu_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > > (match_data->flags & WAVE5_IS_DEC) ? "'DECODE'" : "");
> > > > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Product Code: 0x%x\n", dev-
> >product_code);
> > > > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Firmware Revision: %u\n", fw_revision);
> > > > +
> > > > + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > + wave5_vpu_sleep_wake(&pdev->dev, true, NULL, 0);
> > > > +
> > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > err_enc_unreg:
> > > > @@ -254,6 +318,9 @@ static int wave5_vpu_remove(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > > > *pdev) {
> > > > struct vpu_device *dev = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > > >
> > > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
> > > > + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > +
> > > > mutex_destroy(&dev->dev_lock);
> > > > mutex_destroy(&dev->hw_lock);
> > > > clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(dev->num_clks, dev->clks); @@ -
> 281,6
> > > > +348,7 @@ static struct platform_driver wave5_vpu_driver = {
> > > > .driver = {
> > > > .name = VPU_PLATFORM_DEVICE_NAME,
> > > > .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(wave5_dt_ids),
> > > > + .pm = &wave5_pm_ops,
> > > > },
> > > > .probe = wave5_vpu_probe,
> > > > .remove = wave5_vpu_remove,
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpuapi.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpuapi.c
> > > > index 1a3efb638dde..f1f8e4fc8474 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpuapi.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpuapi.c
> > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > #include <linux/bug.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > > #include "wave5-vpuapi.h"
> > > > #include "wave5-regdefine.h"
> > > > #include "wave5.h"
> > > > @@ -232,6 +233,9 @@ int wave5_vpu_dec_close(struct vpu_instance
> > > > *inst,
> > > > u32 *fail_res)
> > > >
> > > > wave5_vdi_free_dma_memory(vpu_dev, &p_dec_info->vb_task);
> > > >
> > > > + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(inst->dev->dev))
> > > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(inst->dev->dev);
> > > > +
> > > > unlock_and_return:
> > > > mutex_unlock(&vpu_dev->hw_lock);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -734,6 +738,9 @@ int wave5_vpu_enc_close(struct vpu_instance
> > > > *inst,
> > > > u32 *fail_res)
> > > >
> > > > wave5_vdi_free_dma_memory(vpu_dev, &p_enc_info->vb_task);
> > > >
> > > > + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(inst->dev->dev))
> > > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(inst->dev->dev);
> > >
> > > This seems very unnatural. We do the get() in "start_streaming()",
> > > but the
> > > put() is only done when the device is closed, or when the driver is
> > > removed. As this is not balanced, you seem to have to check the
> > > suspended condition all over the place.
> > >
> > > I think we could aim for start_streaming()/stop_streaming() for your
> > > get/put placement. At least they will be bound to an entirely balanced
> API.
> > > But then, a media player in paused sate will prevent that device
> > > from being suspended.
> > >
> > > If the HW is capable of preserving enough state, and From the short
> > > doc I have it gives me the impression it can preserve that, I'd
> > > suggest to follow what hantro driver is doing. What is does is that
> > > it will do get() in device_run(), and put() whenever the job
> > > completes. This driver has been designed so when there is no job, it
> > > means the firmware is currently idle and looking for more work. So
> > > it seems like the perfect moment to do suspend it.
> > >
> > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > mutex_unlock(&vpu_dev->hw_lock);
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5.h
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5.h
> > > > index 063028eccd3b..6125eff938a8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5.h
> > > > @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ int wave5_vpu_get_version(struct vpu_device
> > > > *vpu_dev, u32 *revision);
> > > >
> > > > int wave5_vpu_init(struct device *dev, u8 *fw, size_t size);
> > > >
> > > > +int wave5_vpu_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool i_sleep_wake,
> > > > +const
> > > uint16_t *code,
> > > > + size_t size);
> > > > +
> > > > int wave5_vpu_reset(struct device *dev, enum sw_reset_mode
> > > > reset_mode);
> > > >
> > > > int wave5_vpu_build_up_dec_param(struct vpu_instance *inst,
> > > > struct dec_open_param *param);
> >
