On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 22:25:56 -0500, Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... >> Sorry for giving you a late feedback about those patches. I was busy the >> last two >> weeks, due to my trip to US for KS/LPC. >> >> I've applied patches 1 to 3 (in fact, I got the patches from the >> previous version - >> unfortunately, patchwork do a very bad job when someone sends a new >> series that superseeds >> the previous patches). >> >> I didn't like patch 4 for some reasons: instead of just doing rename, it >> is a >> all-in-one patch, doing several things at the same time. It is hard to >> analyse it by >> just looking at the diffs, as it is not a pure rename patch. Also, it >> doesn't rename >> /drivers/media/IR into something else. >> >> Btw, the patch is currently broken: > > Hm, the series applied cleanly against 2.6.37-rc1 a bit ago: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jarod/linux-2.6-ir.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/staging Still does, and it's no wonder it doesn't apply to staging/for_v2.6.38 since it's a franken-branch of 2.6.36 + staging/for_v2.6.37 + some more patches. -- David HÃrdeman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
