On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 05:12:12PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 at 17:01, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Updates in v2: > > - Ccing Daniel Baluta and Iuliana Prodan the NXP remoteproc patches to > > requests help with testing. > > - Fixed NULL pointer bug in patch1, pointed out by Nikunj. > > - Added some tested/reviewed-by tags. > > > > > > Attaching/detaching of a device to multiple PM domains has started to become a > > common operation for many drivers, typically during ->probe() and ->remove(). > > In most cases, this has lead to lots of boilerplate code in the drivers. > > > > This series adds a pair of helper functions to manage the attach/detach of a > > device to its multiple PM domains. Moreover, a couple of drivers have been > > converted to use the new helpers as a proof of concept. > > > > Note 1) > > The changes in the drivers have only been compile tested, while the helpers > > have been tested along with a couple of local dummy drivers that I have hacked > > up to model both genpd providers and genpd consumers. > > > > Note 2) > > I was struggling to make up mind if we should have a separate helper to attach > > all available power-domains described in DT, rather than providing "NULL" to the > > dev_pm_domain_attach_list(). I decided not to, but please let me know if you > > prefer the other option. > > > > Note 3) > > For OPP integration, as a follow up I am striving to make the > > dev_pm_opp_attach_genpd() redundant. Instead I think we should move towards > > using dev_pm_opp_set_config()->_opp_set_required_devs(), which would allow us to > > use the helpers that $subject series is adding. > > > > Kind regards > > Ulf Hansson > > Rafael, Greg, do have any objections to this series or would you be > okay that I queue this up via my pmdomain tree? I'll defer to Rafael here.
