RE: [PATCH 1/4] media: platform: rzg2l-cru: rzg2l-csi2: Switch to RUNTIME_PM_OPS()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent Pinchart,

Thanks for the feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 3:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] media: platform: rzg2l-cru: rzg2l-csi2: Switch to
> RUNTIME_PM_OPS()
> 
> Hi Biju,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:58:18AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() are deprecated
> 
> Not that I particularly care about SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS, but I'm not aware
> of it being deprecated. Has that been announced somewhere ?

I was under the impression from [1], this is new style and old style going to be deprecated.

If it is not the case, I would like to drop this patch.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg691416.html

> 
> > and require __maybe_unused
> > protection against unused function warnings. The usage of pm_ptr() and
> > RUNTIME_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions, thus
> > suppressing the warning. Thus drop the __maybe_unused markings.
> 
> Have you tried to compile this with CONFIG_PM disabled, and confirmed the
> compiler doesn't generate any warning ?

I am not able to compile with CONFIG_PM disabled as it is throwing errors in power management code.

kernel/power/suspend.c: In function ‘suspend_prepare’:
kernel/power/suspend.c:360:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pm_notifier_call_chain_robust’; did you mean ‘raw_notifier_call_chain_robust’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  360 |  error = pm_notifier_call_chain_robust(PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE, PM_POST_SUSPEND);
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |          raw_notifier_call_chain_robust
kernel/power/hibernate.c:325:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘save_processor_state’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  325 |  save_processor_state();
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/power/suspend.c:372:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘pm_notifier_call_chain’; did you mean ‘raw_notifier_call_chain’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  372 |  pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_POST_SUSPEND);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |  raw_notifier_call_chain
  CC      io_uring/timeout.o
kernel/power/suspend.c: In function ‘suspend_enter’:
kernel/power/suspend.c:405:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dpm_suspend_late’; did you mean ‘dpm_suspend_start’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  405 |  error = dpm_suspend_late(PMSG_SUSPEND);
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |          dpm_suspend_start 

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > index d20f4eff93a4..c4609da9bf1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/renesas/rzg2l-cru/rzg2l-csi2.c
> > @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static void rzg2l_csi2_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >  	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> >  }
> >
> > -static int __maybe_unused rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device
> > *dev)
> > +static int rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct rzg2l_csi2 *csi2 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int __maybe_unused rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume(struct device
> > *dev)
> > +static int rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct rzg2l_csi2 *csi2 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >
> > @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> > rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)  }
> >
> >  static const struct dev_pm_ops rzg2l_csi2_pm_ops = {
> > -	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_suspend,
> rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> > +	RUNTIME_PM_OPS(rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_suspend,
> > +rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> 
> While at it, I would wrap the line to
> 
> 	RUNTIME_PM_OPS(rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_suspend,
> 		       rzg2l_csi2_pm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> 
> Up to you.

If it is not a requirement to move to use the modern pm_ops/pm_sleep_ops
then as said in the above I would like to drop this patch.

Cheers,
Biju

> 
> >  };
> >
> >  static const struct of_device_id rzg2l_csi2_of_table[] = { @@ -865,7
> > +865,7 @@ static struct platform_driver rzg2l_csi2_pdrv = {
> >  	.driver	= {
> >  		.name = "rzg2l-csi2",
> >  		.of_match_table = rzg2l_csi2_of_table,
> > -		.pm = &rzg2l_csi2_pm_ops,
> > +		.pm = pm_ptr(&rzg2l_csi2_pm_ops),
> >  	},
> >  };
> >
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux