Fix spelling mistakes as reported by codespell. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff -- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static atomic64_t dma_fence_context_coun * * * Drivers are allowed to call dma_fence_wait() from their &mmu_notifier * respectively &mmu_interval_notifier callbacks. This means any code required - * for fence completeion cannot allocate memory with GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO. + * for fence completion cannot allocate memory with GFP_NOFS or GFP_NOIO. * Only GFP_ATOMIC is permissible, which might fail. * * Note that only GPU drivers have a reasonable excuse for both requiring @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ dma_fence_wait_timeout(struct dma_fence EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_wait_timeout); /** - * dma_fence_release - default relese function for fences + * dma_fence_release - default release function for fences * @kref: &dma_fence.recfount * * This is the default release functions for &dma_fence. Drivers shouldn't call @@ -974,8 +974,8 @@ void dma_fence_set_deadline(struct dma_f EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_set_deadline); /** - * dma_fence_describe - Dump fence describtion into seq_file - * @fence: the 6fence to describe + * dma_fence_describe - Dump fence description into seq_file + * @fence: the fence to describe * @seq: the seq_file to put the textual description into * * Dump a textual description of the fence and it's state into the seq_file.
