Hi Mikhail, On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 08:40:27PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote: > Introduce local variable for regmap within the ov4689_set_ctrl > function. This adjustment eliminates repetition within the function. > > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c | 11 +++++------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c > index 3b20eba59c9c..d42f5d1a1ba8 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c > @@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) > { > struct ov4689 *ov4689 = > container_of(ctrl->handler, struct ov4689, ctrl_handler); > + struct regmap *regmap = ov4689->regmap; > struct device *dev = ov4689->dev; > int sensor_gain; > s64 max_expo; > @@ -603,16 +604,15 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) > switch (ctrl->id) { > case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE: > /* 4 least significant bits of exposure are fractional part */ > - ret = cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_EXPOSURE, > - ctrl->val << 4, NULL); > + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_EXPOSURE, ctrl->val << 4, &ret); If you do this, ret needs to have been initialised to 0, but it isn't. Same for the changes below. > break; > case V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN: > ret = ov4689_map_gain(ov4689, ctrl->val, &sensor_gain); > - cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_GAIN, sensor_gain, &ret); > + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_GAIN, sensor_gain, &ret); > break; > case V4L2_CID_VBLANK: > - ret = cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_VTS, > - ctrl->val + ov4689->cur_mode->height, NULL); > + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_VTS, > + ctrl->val + ov4689->cur_mode->height, &ret); > break; > case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN: > ret = ov4689_enable_test_pattern(ov4689, ctrl->val); > @@ -625,7 +625,6 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl) > } > > pm_runtime_put(dev); > - I thought it was nice. > return ret; > } > -- Regards, Sakari Ailus