On Thu, 2024-01-04 at 05:42 +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> Hi, Jason:
>
> On Wed, 2024-01-03 at 07:03 +0000, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-12-28 at 07:37 +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> > > Hi, Jason:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2023-12-22 at 12:52 +0800, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> > > > To support secure video path feature, GCE have to read/write
> > > > registgers
> > > > in the secure world. GCE will enable the secure access
> > > > permission
> > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > HW who wants to access the secure content buffer.
> > > >
> > > > Add CMDQ secure mailbox driver to make CMDQ client user is able
> > > > to
> > > > sending their HW settings to the secure world. So that GCE can
> > > > execute
> > > > all instructions to configure HW in the secure world.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +static bool cmdq_sec_irq_handler(struct cmdq_sec_thread
> > > > *sec_thread,
> > > > + const u32 cookie, const int
> > > > err)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct cmdq_sec_task *sec_task;
> > > > + struct cmdq_task *task, *temp, *cur_task = NULL;
> > > > + struct cmdq_sec *cmdq = container_of(sec_thread-
> > > > >thread.chan-
> > > > > mbox, struct cmdq_sec, mbox);
> > > >
> > > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > > + int done;
> > > > +
> > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&sec_thread->thread.chan->lock,
> > > > flags);
> > > > + if (sec_thread->wait_cookie <= cookie)
> > > > + done = cookie - sec_thread->wait_cookie + 1;
> > > > + else if (sec_thread->wait_cookie == (cookie + 1) %
> > > > CMDQ_MAX_COOKIE_VALUE)
> > > > + done = 0;
> > > > + else
> > > > + done = CMDQ_MAX_COOKIE_VALUE - sec_thread-
> > > > >wait_cookie
> > > > + 1 + cookie + 1;
> > > > +
> > > > + list_for_each_entry_safe(task, temp, &sec_thread-
> > > > > thread.task_busy_list, list_entry) {
> > > >
> > > > + if (!done)
> > > > + break;
> > > > +
> > > > + sec_task = container_of(task, struct
> > > > cmdq_sec_task,
> > > > task);
> > > > + cmdq_sec_task_done(sec_task, err);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (sec_thread->task_cnt)
> > > > + sec_thread->task_cnt -= 1;
> > > > +
> > > > + done--;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + cur_task = list_first_entry_or_null(&sec_thread-
> > > > > thread.task_busy_list,
> > > >
> > > > + struct cmdq_task,
> > > > list_entry);
> > > > + if (err && cur_task) {
> > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sec_thread-
> > > > >thread.chan->lock,
> > > > flags);
> > > > +
> > > > + sec_task = container_of(cur_task, struct
> > > > cmdq_sec_task,
> > > > task);
> > > > +
> > > > + /* for error task, cancel, callback and done */
> > > > + memset(&cmdq->cancel, 0, sizeof(cmdq->cancel));
> > > > + cmdq_sec_task_submit(cmdq, sec_task,
> > > > CMD_CMDQ_IWC_CANCEL_TASK,
> > > > + sec_thread->idx, &cmdq-
> > > > >cancel);
> > >
> > > cmdq->cancel is useless, so drop it.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > CK
> > >
> >
> > I think we should use this to tell CMDQ PTA which thread need to
> > reset
> > and update its cookie value, so CMDQ can still move on when error
> > occurs.
>
> CMD_CMDQ_IWC_CANCEL_TASK is used to tell CMDQ PTA which thread need
> to
> reset and update its cookie value, and cmdq->cancel is the return
> value. But you does not process this return value, so drop cmdq-
> >cancel.
>
Got it. I'll remove that return value.
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
> Regards,
> CK
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jason-JH.Lin
