On 03/01/2024 17:54, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:40:02AM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 03/01/2024 07:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03/01/2024 03:18, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
Add bindings for qcom,sc8280xp-camss in order to support the camera
subsystem for sc8280xp as found in the Lenovo x13s Laptop.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.yaml | 512 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 512 insertions(+)
This patch fails, as pointed out by Robot.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Ah its in Bjorn's 6.8 clock pull tree.
I will repost when it hits -next
How is that helpful? It will still fail, and the media maintainers still
can't apply this. If you work on linux-next, you'd better be
aware of and explain the dependencies.
Rob
Well, it actually is in -next as at the time I posted this patch
https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/blob/linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8280xp-camcc.h
per the branch referenced in the cover letter
https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi
Looking at the name of the branch for your bot
20240103-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1-1-abacaa63a961@xxxxxxxxxx
Does this branch name in the bot output
"linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1" imply it built from
the branch I referenced in the cover letter
"linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi" ?
Am I getting the base of the build right ?
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240103-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1-1-abacaa63a961@xxxxxxxxxx/
If not - what is the base of the build ?
---
bod
