On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:02:51AM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 11:13:09AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Tommaso,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > Use the imperative in the subject line:
> >
> > media: i2c: alvium: Remove the fr field of the alvium_dev structure
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 09:56:07AM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
> > > The fr (frame rate) field of the alvium_dev structure is
> > > only used to pass result from alvium_set_frame_interval() to
> > > alvium_set_frame_rate() that writes this info into the hw reg.
> > > Replace them with function parameter.
> >
> > Replace it with a function parameter.
>
> Thanks I'll fix this in v3.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tomm.merciai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > > drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h | 1 -
> > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c
> > > index 0dcd69bf9f92..a9ff6cc97cff 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.c
> > > @@ -1185,19 +1185,19 @@ static int alvium_get_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static int alvium_set_frame_rate(struct alvium_dev *alvium)
> > > +static int alvium_set_frame_rate(struct alvium_dev *alvium, u64 fr)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = &alvium->i2c_client->dev;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > ret = alvium_write_hshake(alvium, REG_BCRM_ACQUISITION_FRAME_RATE_RW,
> > > - alvium->fr);
> > > + fr);
> > > if (ret) {
> > > dev_err(dev, "Fail to set frame rate lanes reg\n");
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - dev_dbg(dev, "set frame rate: %llu us\n", alvium->fr);
> > > + dev_dbg(dev, "set frame rate: %llu us\n", fr);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -1661,10 +1661,11 @@ static int alvium_g_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int alvium_set_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium,
> > > - struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *fi)
> > > + struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *fi,
> > > + u64 *req_fr)
> > > {
> > > struct device *dev = &alvium->i2c_client->dev;
> > > - u64 req_fr, dft_fr, min_fr, max_fr;
> > > + u64 dft_fr, min_fr, max_fr;
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > if (fi->interval.denominator == 0)
> > > @@ -1681,13 +1682,12 @@ static int alvium_set_frame_interval(struct alvium_dev *alvium,
> > > dev_dbg(dev, "fi->interval.denominator = %d\n",
> > > fi->interval.denominator);
> > >
> > > - req_fr = (u64)((fi->interval.denominator * USEC_PER_SEC) /
> > > + *req_fr = (u64)((fi->interval.denominator * USEC_PER_SEC) /
> > > fi->interval.numerator);
> > >
> > > - if (req_fr >= max_fr && req_fr <= min_fr)
> > > - req_fr = dft_fr;
> > > + if (*req_fr >= max_fr && *req_fr <= min_fr)
> > > + *req_fr = dft_fr;
> >
> > Shouldn't we clamp the value to [min, max] instead of using the default
> > if it's out of range ? Something like
> >
> > *req_fr = clamp(*req_fr, min_fr, max_fr)
> >
> > This makes me realize that the current code is wrong, req_fr can't be >=
> > max and <= min at the same time. You probably meant || instead of &&.
> >
> > This should be fixed in a separate patch.
>
> If this is ok for you, after this series I can put a patch with || fix
> instead of clamping, because if we clamp dft_fr is not used any more.
> After if you agree I will work on clamping.
> Thanks for the catch! :)
It's fine to fix this on top of the series, but I don't see why you
would need to first use ||. You can call clamp() and remove dft_fr.
> > >
> > > - alvium->fr = req_fr;
> > > alvium->frame_interval.numerator = fi->interval.numerator;
> > > alvium->frame_interval.denominator = fi->interval.denominator;
> > >
> > > @@ -1699,6 +1699,7 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > struct v4l2_subdev_frame_interval *fi)
> > > {
> > > struct alvium_dev *alvium = sd_to_alvium(sd);
> > > + u64 req_fr = ALVIUM_DEFAULT_FR_HZ;
> >
> > Do you need to initialize the variable ? It doesn't seem to be required.
>
> Really not, it's just to maintain the logic of alvium->fr. I will drop
> this in v3, thanks!
>
> > With these small issues fixed,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -1711,9 +1712,9 @@ static int alvium_s_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > if (alvium->streaming)
> > > return -EBUSY;
> > >
> > > - ret = alvium_set_frame_interval(alvium, fi);
> > > + ret = alvium_set_frame_interval(alvium, fi, &req_fr);
> > > if (!ret)
> > > - ret = alvium_set_frame_rate(alvium);
> > > + ret = alvium_set_frame_rate(alvium, req_fr);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > @@ -2273,7 +2274,6 @@ static int alvium_subdev_init(struct alvium_dev *alvium)
> > > /* Setup initial frame interval*/
> > > alvium->frame_interval.numerator = 1;
> > > alvium->frame_interval.denominator = ALVIUM_DEFAULT_FR_HZ;
> > > - alvium->fr = ALVIUM_DEFAULT_FR_HZ;
> > >
> > > /* Setup the initial mode */
> > > alvium->mode.fmt = alvium_csi2_default_fmt;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h
> > > index 17f0bbbd1839..80066ac25047 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/alvium-csi2.h
> > > @@ -443,7 +443,6 @@ struct alvium_dev {
> > >
> > > struct alvium_mode mode;
> > > struct v4l2_fract frame_interval;
> > > - u64 fr;
> > >
> > > u8 h_sup_csi_lanes;
> > > u64 link_freq;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
