On 2023-12-11 at 20:11 +02, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:50:08PM +0300, Mikhail Rudenko wrote:
>> Introduces local variables for regmap and the control value within the
>> ov4689_set_ctrl function. This adjustment eliminates repetition within
>> the function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Rudenko <mike.rudenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c
>> index 8c120d7f7830..42700ecfbe0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov4689.c
>> @@ -584,7 +584,9 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>> {
>> struct ov4689 *ov4689 =
>> container_of(ctrl->handler, struct ov4689, ctrl_handler);
>> + struct regmap *regmap = ov4689->regmap;
>> struct device *dev = ov4689->dev;
>> + s32 val = ctrl->val;
>
> For ctrl->val, I think the code is clearer without this change. When
> reading the function, seeing "val", I need to look up what it is, while
> seeing "ctrl->val" gives me more context and makes (in my opinion) the
> code more readable.
Agreed, will revert to ctrl->val in v2.
>> int sensor_gain;
>> s64 max_expo;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -593,7 +595,7 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>> switch (ctrl->id) {
>> case V4L2_CID_VBLANK:
>> /* Update max exposure while meeting expected vblanking */
>> - max_expo = ov4689->cur_mode->height + ctrl->val - 4;
>> + max_expo = ov4689->cur_mode->height + val - 4;
>> __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(ov4689->exposure,
>> ov4689->exposure->minimum, max_expo,
>> ov4689->exposure->step,
>> @@ -607,36 +609,34 @@ static int ov4689_set_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
>> switch (ctrl->id) {
>> case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE:
>> /* 4 least significant bits of exposure are fractional part */
>> - ret = cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_EXPOSURE,
>> - ctrl->val << 4, NULL);
>> + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_EXPOSURE, val << 4, &ret);
>> break;
>> case V4L2_CID_ANALOGUE_GAIN:
>> - ret = ov4689_map_gain(ov4689, ctrl->val, &sensor_gain);
>> + ret = ov4689_map_gain(ov4689, val, &sensor_gain);
>>
>> - cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_GAIN_H,
>> + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_GAIN_H,
>> (sensor_gain >> OV4689_GAIN_H_SHIFT) &
>> OV4689_GAIN_H_MASK, &ret);
>>
>> - cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_GAIN_L,
>> + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_GAIN_L,
>> sensor_gain & OV4689_GAIN_L_MASK,
>> &ret);
>> break;
>> case V4L2_CID_VBLANK:
>> - ret = cci_write(ov4689->regmap, OV4689_REG_VTS,
>> - ctrl->val + ov4689->cur_mode->height, NULL);
>> + cci_write(regmap, OV4689_REG_VTS,
>> + val + ov4689->cur_mode->height, &ret);
>> break;
>> case V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN:
>> - ret = ov4689_enable_test_pattern(ov4689, ctrl->val);
>> + ret = ov4689_enable_test_pattern(ov4689, val);
>> break;
>> default:
>> dev_warn(dev, "%s Unhandled id:0x%x, val:0x%x\n",
>> - __func__, ctrl->id, ctrl->val);
>> + __func__, ctrl->id, val);
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> pm_runtime_put(dev);
>> -
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>>
--
Best regards,
Mikhail Rudenko
