On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:13:34AM +0000, Sean Young wrote: > In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context, > we will need two functions for applying pwm changes: > > int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); > int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); > > This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following > commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. > > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx> Not a in-detail-review, but I just noticed again, that we have K: pwm_(config|apply_state|ops) in MAINTAINERS. That one needs adaption, too. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
