On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:49:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 01:02:45PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 04:51:53AM -0500, Umang Jain wrote: > > > Drop vchiq_log_error() macro which wraps dev_dbg(). Introduce the usage > > > of dev_dbg() directly. > > > > > > Add a new enum vchiq_log_type and log_type() helper to faciliate the > > > type of logging in dev_dbg(). This will help to determine the type of > > > logging("error", "warning", "debug", "trace") to dynamic debug. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 54 ++++---- > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c | 6 +- > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 126 ++++++++++-------- > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 23 +++- > > > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c | 47 ++++--- > > > 5 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > > > index 9fb3e240d9de..2cb2a6503058 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > > > @@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ int vchiq_initialise(struct vchiq_instance **instance_out) > > > > > > instance = kzalloc(sizeof(*instance), GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!instance) { > > > - vchiq_log_error(state->dev, VCHIQ_CORE, > > > - "%s: error allocating vchiq instance\n", __func__); > > > + dev_dbg(state->dev, "%s: %s: %s: error allocating vchiq instance\n", > > > + log_cat(VCHIQ_CORE), log_type(ERROR), __func__); > > > > All dev_dbg() calls have __func__ in them automatically, you never need > > to duplicate it again as that's redundant :( > > Oh ? I didn't know that, and can't find it in the code. I may be missing > something though. Are you referring to the +f flag for dynamic debug > entries ? It won't work if dynamic debug isn't enabled though, but maybe > we don't care about that ? Yes, the "f" flag is what controls this, and if dynamic debug isn't enabled, you don't get any message here and we don't care about it :) thanks, greg k-h