Hi Sakari,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Add fwnode_name_eq() to implement the functionality of of_node_name_eq()
> on fwnode property API. The same convention of ending the comparison at
> '@' (besides '\0') is applied on also both ACPI and swnode. The function
> is intended for comparing unit address-less node names on DT and firmware
> or swnodes compliant with DT bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> since v1:
>
> - Use str_has_prefix().
>
> - Fix kernel-doc for @fwnode argument.
>
> - Use size_t type for len.
>
> The patch is untested.
Not anymore :-)
Which tree will this get merged through ? The thp7312 driver depends on
this patch, and I would like to get it in v6.8. If we can merge this
through the media tree it could be the simplest option, otherwise I'll
need a stable branch based on v6.7-rc1.
> drivers/base/property.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/property.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
> index 8c40abed7852..89a6e0833356 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/property.c
> @@ -594,6 +594,34 @@ const char *fwnode_get_name_prefix(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> return fwnode_call_ptr_op(fwnode, get_name_prefix);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * fwnode_name_eq - Return true if node name is equal
> + * @fwnode: The firmware node
> + * @name: The name to which to compare the node name
> + *
> + * Compare the name provided as an argument to the name of the node, stopping
> + * the comparison to either '\0' or '@' character, whichever comes first. This
> + * function is generally used for comparing node names while ignoring the
> + * possible unit address of the node.
> + *
> + * Return: true if the node name matches with the name provided in the @name
> + * argument, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool fwnode_name_eq(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *name)
> +{
> + const char *node_name;
> + size_t len;
> +
> + node_name = fwnode_get_name(fwnode);
> + if (!node_name)
> + return false;
> +
> + len = strchrnul(node_name, '@') - node_name;
> +
> + return str_has_prefix(node_name, name) == len;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_name_eq);
> +
> /**
> * fwnode_get_parent - Return parent firwmare node
> * @fwnode: Firmware whose parent is retrieved
> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> index 083a1f41364b..096ade186601 100644
> --- a/include/linux/property.h
> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_find_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>
> const char *fwnode_get_name(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
> const char *fwnode_get_name_prefix(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
> +bool fwnode_name_eq(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *name);
>
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_get_parent(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
> struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_get_next_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
