vb2_get_buffer() already checks if the requested index is valid. Stop duplicating this kind of check everywhere. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c index 2ffb097bf00a..c6ebc8d2c537 100644 --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c @@ -823,10 +823,6 @@ int vb2_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *mdev, return -EBUSY; } - if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) { - dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index); if (!vb) { dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", b->index); @@ -898,10 +894,6 @@ int vb2_expbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_exportbuffer *eb) { struct vb2_buffer *vb; - if (eb->index >= q->num_buffers) { - dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, eb->index); if (!vb) { dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", eb->index); -- 2.39.2