Hi Krzysztof,
On 10/9/23 16:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 09/10/2023 16:24, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 10/9/23 15:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 09/10/2023 15:49, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 10/5/23 21:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 04/10/2023 11:15, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
Add STM32MP25 VENC video encoder bindings.
I don't understand why this binding is separate from video decoder.
Merge them.
VDEC and VENC are two independent IPs with their own clock, reset,
interrupt & register set, they have their own access to APB/AXI bus.
Moreover future chipsets may embed only VENC or VDEC.
Hoping that this clarifies the reason of two different bindings.
No, it does not. These are no reasons to have independent bindings,
except when having actual impact on the bindings. The bindings look
identical. What are the differences?
I'm sorry but I really don't understand your point, these are two
different IPs with very different registers in it, so why should
I share that in a single binding ?
Because the binding is identical. If not, maybe I missed something, so
please point me to differences in the binding.
OK, currently they are identical so I will merge into a single one
even if I disagree on that.
I hope that in future this will not change otherwise I'll need to
revisit that and make separate bindings as initially proposed...
I'll so push a v2 with merged version proposal.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
BR,
Hugues.
