Em 08-10-2010 18:15, Daniel Drake escreveu: > On 8 October 2010 22:11, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm certainly not attached to this mode, but...does it harm anybody if >> it's there? > > Yes. Applications like gstreamer will pick this resolution if its the > closest resolution to the target file resolution. On XO-1 we always > pick a low res so gstreamer picks this one. And we end up with a video > that only records a miniscule portion of the FOV. > > All the other settings of the camera scale the image so that the whole > FOV is covered. But this one records at normal resolution, only > sending a small center portion of the FOV. The same pixels can be read > by recording at full res and then just cutting out the center bit. Seems an application-specific issue to me. I would accept a patch at cafe-ccic limiting the minimum resolution (as it is device-specific), but I agree with Jon that limiting it at the sensor is not a good thing to do. Getting full res means to require higher bandwidths at the bus (and this may be a problem if someone wants to have more than one camera, and the bridge is USB). Also, it will eat more CPU to downscale. Cheers, mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
