On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, at 08:26, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 23/09/2023 20:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> >>> -#define V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE 32 >>> +#define V4L2_SUBDEV_NAME_SIZE 52 >> >> Can we allocate it dynamically instead ? > > Anything is possible :-) > > But that's a separate issue and, I think, should be part of a larger > uAPI discussion. Right now it is just to squash those annoying warnings. Agreed, and I don't think that dynamic allocation here would help either on saving memory (because of the slab overhead) or for correctness (making it even harder for uapi to if there is no upper bound on the name length). Arnd
