On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:30:37AM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > This adds the binding for describing a CMA memory for MediaTek SVP(Secure > Video Path). CMA is a Linux thing. How is this related to CMA? > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml | 42 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..cc10e00d35c4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reserved-memory/mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: MediaTek Secure Video Path Reserved Memory What makes this specific to Mediatek? Secure video path is fairly common, right? > + > +description: > + This binding describes the reserved memory for secure video path. > + > +maintainers: > + - Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: reserved-memory.yaml > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - reusable > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + > + reserved-memory { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + ranges; > + > + reserved-memory@80000000 { > + compatible = "mediatek,secure_cma_chunkmem"; > + reusable; > + reg = <0x80000000 0x18000000>; > + }; > + }; > -- > 2.25.1 >
