Hi Benjamin, On 05/09/2023 16:28, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > Le 05/09/2023 à 10:17, Hans Verkuil a écrit : >> On 01/09/2023 14:44, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: >>> VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS ioctl allows to delete buffers from a queue. >>> The number of buffers to delete in given by count field of >>> struct v4l2_delete_buffers and the range start at the index >>> specified in the same structure. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> v6: >>> - Add lock in vb2_core_delete_buf() >>> - Fix typo and comments >>> - Add flags in VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS decalaration >>> >>> .../userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst | 1 + >>> .../media/v4l/vidioc-delete-bufs.rst | 73 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 24 ++++++ >>> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 38 +++++++++- >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c | 1 + >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 17 +++++ >>> include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h | 4 + >>> include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 9 +++ >>> include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h | 11 +++ >>> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 16 ++++ >>> 10 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-bufs.rst >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst >>> index 15ff0bf7bbe6..3fd567695477 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst >>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst >>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Function Reference >>> vidioc-dbg-g-chip-info >>> vidioc-dbg-g-register >>> vidioc-decoder-cmd >>> + vidioc-delete-bufs >>> vidioc-dqevent >>> vidioc-dv-timings-cap >>> vidioc-encoder-cmd >>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-bufs.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-bufs.rst >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..a55fe6331fc8 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-bufs.rst >>> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ >>> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later >>> +.. c:namespace:: V4L >>> + >>> +.. _VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS: >>> + >>> +************************ >>> +ioctl VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS >>> +************************ >>> + >>> +Name >>> +==== >>> + >>> +VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS - Deletes buffers from a queue >>> + >>> +Synopsis >>> +======== >>> + >>> +.. c:macro:: VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFs >>> + >>> +``int ioctl(int fd, VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFs, struct v4l2_delete_buffers *argp)`` >>> + >>> +Arguments >>> +========= >>> + >>> +``fd`` >>> + File descriptor returned by :c:func:`open()`. >>> + >>> +``argp`` >>> + Pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_delete_buffers`. >>> + >>> +Description >>> +=========== >>> + >>> +Applications can optionally call the :ref:`VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS` ioctl to >>> +delete buffers from a queue. >>> + >>> +.. c:type:: v4l2_delete_buffers >>> + >>> +.. tabularcolumns:: |p{4.4cm}|p{4.4cm}|p{8.5cm}| >>> + >>> +.. flat-table:: struct v4l2_delete_buffers >>> + :header-rows: 0 >>> + :stub-columns: 0 >>> + :widths: 1 1 2 >>> + >>> + * - __u32 >>> + - ``index`` >>> + - The starting buffer index to delete. >>> + * - __u32 >>> + - ``count`` >>> + - The number of buffers to be deleted. >> That's not quite correct. This function will delete the buffers with indices >> index until index+count-1. And indices in that range have to be valid buffers, >> i.e. you can't have already deleted buffers in that range. >> >> Or should we allow that? It is a fair question. >> >> All buffers also have to be in the DEQUEUED state. >> >> The text above suggests that given the following valid indices: >> >> 0, 1, 3, 4 (so the buffer with index 2 was already deleted) >> >> deleting 2 buffers from index 1 would delete buffers 1, 3. When in >> fact it will attempt to delete buffers 1 and 2. >> >> Also document explicitly that calling this with count=0 (and perhaps >> index=0 as well?) can be used to check if this ioctl is supported. > > I will do that. > >> >>> + * - __u32 >>> + - ``type`` >>> + - Type of the stream or buffers, this is the same as the struct >>> + :c:type:`v4l2_format` ``type`` field. See >>> + :c:type:`v4l2_buf_type` for valid values. >>> + * - __u32 >>> + - ``reserved``\ [13] >>> + - A place holder for future extensions. Drivers and applications >>> + must set the array to zero. >> What should happen if you delete ALL buffers with this call? I.e., the >> equivalent to REQBUFS with count=0. >> >> Thinking about this the main difference is that DELETE_BUFS can only delete >> dequeued buffers and it does not stop streaming if all buffers are deleted. >> >> So REQBUFS with count=0 (or a STREAMOFF) is still needed to officially stop >> streaming and cancel the queue. >> >> Basically REQBUFS with count=0 is almost the equivalent of calling STREAMOFF followed >> by DELETE_BUFS for all buffers. Almost, but not quite: REQBUFS(0) also reports >> if the queue is unbalanced, and it sets q->num_buffers to 0. And in vb2_ioctl_reqbufs >> it will set vdev->queue->owner to NULL. >> >> I am inclined to do the same if DELETE_BUFS deletes all buffers. > > Unlike REQBUFS DELETE_BUFS can delete buffers while streaming so for me the ownership > should not change even if there is no more dequeued buffers. > For REQBUFS with count=0 means that the going stream is stopped so we can delete all the buffers > while DELETE_BUFS usage is to delete buffers while keeping the stream alive. I'm undecided on this. It's something we can decide later. > >> >>> + >>> +Return Value >>> +============ >>> + >>> +On success 0 is returned, on error -1 and the ``errno`` variable is set >>> +appropriately. The generic error codes are described at the >>> +:ref:`Generic Error Codes <gen-errors>` chapter. >>> + >>> +EBUSY >>> + File I/O is in progress. >>> + >>> +EINVAL >>> + The buffer ``index`` doesn't exist in the queue. >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c >>> index dc7f6b59d237..9edb2a1e95fc 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c >>> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c >>> @@ -1633,6 +1633,30 @@ int vb2_core_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb, void *pb) >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_core_prepare_buf); >>> +int vb2_core_delete_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb) >>> +{ >>> + mutex_lock(&q->mmap_lock); >>> + if (vb->planes[0].mem_priv) >>> + call_void_vb_qop(vb, buf_cleanup, vb); >>> + >>> + /* Free MMAP buffers or release USERPTR buffers */ >>> + if (q->memory == VB2_MEMORY_MMAP) >>> + __vb2_buf_mem_free(vb); >>> + else if (q->memory == VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF) >>> + __vb2_buf_dmabuf_put(vb); >>> + else >>> + __vb2_buf_userptr_put(vb); >>> + >>> + vb2_queue_remove_buffer(q, vb); >>> + mutex_unlock(&q->mmap_lock); >>> + >>> + dprintk(q, 2, "buffer %d deleted\n", vb->index); >>> + kfree(vb); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_core_delete_buf); >> This is duplicating what already happens in __vb2_free_mem and __vb2_queue_free. >> >> That code needs to be refactored. >> >> What you want is a __vb2_delete_buffers(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int index, unsigned int buffers) >> function that is called with mmap_lock held and that deletes buffers in the range 'index' >> to 'index + count - 1'. Buffers may already be deleted. >> >> __vb2_free_mem does almost do all of that already. >> >> Then this new function can be called from __vb2_queue_free() and you can make >> a vb2_core_delete_bufs() function that takes the lock and calls __vb2_delete_buffers. >> >> Another note: currently __vb2_queue_free checks if any of the buffers had unbalanced >> operations. That check needs to be moved to __vb2_delete_buffers as well otherwise >> that would never be reported when using DELETE_BUFS. > > Loops in __vb2_queue_free() and __vb2_free_mem() try to delete buffers at the end of the > queue, I could just modify these functions prototype and loops to start from a given index. > That should do the job but have impact on create_bufs (see below) > >> >>> + >>> /* >>> * vb2_start_streaming() - Attempt to start streaming. >>> * @q: videobuf2 queue >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c >>> index 8ba658ad9891..d0098f58a65c 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c >>> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c >>> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static int vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *md >>> vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index); >>> if (!vb) { >>> - dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer is NULL\n", opname); >>> + dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer %u was deleted\n", opname, b->index); >>> return -EINVAL; >>> } >>> @@ -757,6 +757,42 @@ int vb2_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *mdev, >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_prepare_buf); >>> +int vb2_delete_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_delete_buffers *d) >>> +{ >>> + struct vb2_buffer *vb; >>> + unsigned int index; >>> + int ret = 0; >>> + >> Add: >> >> if (!d->count) >> return 0; >> >> (possibly also check if !d->index) >> >>> + if (d->index > q->num_buffers || >>> should be >= here. >>> + d->count > q->num_buffers || >>> + (d->index + d->count) > q->num_buffers) { >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + } >> Once we can delete buffers, how does that change the meaning of num_buffers? >> Isn't this really max_buffer_index or something similar? But we probably also >> still need to keep track of the actual number of buffers. >> >> And create_bufs still allocated buffers from the last index onwards, it does >> not attempt to reuse indices of previously deleted buffers. > > Reuse previous indices require to be sure that a range of index is free because > create_bufs returns, in index parameter, the starting buffer index. > I will add a function to find the first available range and use it in vb2_create_bufs() > to change how create->index is set. > Hans, sound good for you ? That's what I had in mind. It is an option to keep a bitmap to keep track of which buffer indices are in use. You could use bitmap_find_next_zero_area to find the free range. Just an option. > >> >> There are a lot of drivers that use num_buffers, they will have to be audited. >> >> This needs a lot more thought. >> >>> + >>> + for (index = d->index; index < d->index + d->count; index++) { >>> + vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, index); >>> + if (!vb) { >>> + dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer\n"); >>> + ret = -EINVAL; >>> + goto error; >>> + } >>> + if (vb->state != VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED) { >>> + dprintk(q, 1, "can't delete non dequeued buffer index %d\n", vb->index); >>> + ret = -EINVAL; >>> + goto error; >>> + } >> These checks have to take place first, then, if all is OK, you call vb2_core_delete_bufs. >> >> Actually, thinking this over, I would move all these checks to vb2_core_delete_bufs. >> >> It can all be put under the mmap_lock mutex to ensure nobody is messing around >> with the queue while this takes place. >> >> Note that when vb2_core_reqbufs() is called with count=0, then if it sees that >> a buffer is still in use (mmaped), it will log a debug message that the buffers >> are orphaned. We should keep that, I believe. >> >>> + >>> + ret = vb2_core_delete_buf(q, vb); >>> + if (ret) >>> + break; >>> + } >>> + >>> +error: >>> + d->index = index; >> I wouldn't do this. I don't think this is useful. >> >>> + return ret; >>> +} >>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_delete_bufs); >>> + >>> int vb2_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_create_buffers *create) >>> { >>> unsigned requested_planes = 1; >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c >>> index f81279492682..215654fd6581 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c >>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c >>> @@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ static void determine_valid_ioctls(struct video_device *vdev) >>> SET_VALID_IOCTL(ops, VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF, vidioc_prepare_buf); >>> SET_VALID_IOCTL(ops, VIDIOC_STREAMON, vidioc_streamon); >>> SET_VALID_IOCTL(ops, VIDIOC_STREAMOFF, vidioc_streamoff); >>> + SET_VALID_IOCTL(ops, VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS, vidioc_delete_bufs); >>> } >>> if (is_vid || is_vbi || is_meta) { >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c >>> index f4d9d6279094..aac3a0ea0126 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c >>> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c >>> @@ -489,6 +489,13 @@ static void v4l_print_create_buffers(const void *arg, bool write_only) >>> v4l_print_format(&p->format, write_only); >>> } >>> +static void v4l_print_delete_buffers(const void *arg, bool write_only) >>> +{ >>> + const struct v4l2_delete_buffers *p = arg; >>> + >>> + pr_cont("index=%d, count=%d\n", p->index, p->count); >> Use %u since both args are unsigned. >> >>> +} >>> + >>> static void v4l_print_streamparm(const void *arg, bool write_only) >>> { >>> const struct v4l2_streamparm *p = arg; >>> @@ -2160,6 +2167,15 @@ static int v4l_prepare_buf(const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops *ops, >>> return ret ? ret : ops->vidioc_prepare_buf(file, fh, b); >>> } >>> +static int v4l_delete_bufs(const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops *ops, >>> + struct file *file, void *fh, void *arg) >>> +{ >>> + struct v4l2_delete_buffers *delete = arg; >>> + int ret = check_fmt(file, delete->type); >>> + >>> + return ret ? ret : ops->vidioc_delete_bufs(file, fh, delete); >>> +} >>> + >>> static int v4l_g_parm(const struct v4l2_ioctl_ops *ops, >>> struct file *file, void *fh, void *arg) >>> { >>> @@ -2909,6 +2925,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_ioctl_info v4l2_ioctls[] = { >>> IOCTL_INFO(VIDIOC_ENUM_FREQ_BANDS, v4l_enum_freq_bands, v4l_print_freq_band, 0), >>> IOCTL_INFO(VIDIOC_DBG_G_CHIP_INFO, v4l_dbg_g_chip_info, v4l_print_dbg_chip_info, INFO_FL_CLEAR(v4l2_dbg_chip_info, match)), >>> IOCTL_INFO(VIDIOC_QUERY_EXT_CTRL, v4l_query_ext_ctrl, v4l_print_query_ext_ctrl, INFO_FL_CTRL | INFO_FL_CLEAR(v4l2_query_ext_ctrl, id)), >>> + IOCTL_INFO(VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS, v4l_delete_bufs, v4l_print_delete_buffers, INFO_FL_PRIO | INFO_FL_QUEUE | INFO_FL_CLEAR(v4l2_delete_buffers, type)), >>> }; >>> #define V4L2_IOCTLS ARRAY_SIZE(v4l2_ioctls) >>> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h b/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h >>> index edb733f21604..55afbde54211 100644 >>> --- a/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h >>> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h >>> @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ struct v4l2_fh; >>> * :ref:`VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS <vidioc_create_bufs>` ioctl >>> * @vidioc_prepare_buf: pointer to the function that implements >>> * :ref:`VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF <vidioc_prepare_buf>` ioctl >>> + * @vidioc_delete_bufs: pointer to the function that implements >>> + * :ref:`VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS <vidioc_delete_bufs>` ioctl >>> * @vidioc_overlay: pointer to the function that implements >>> * :ref:`VIDIOC_OVERLAY <vidioc_overlay>` ioctl >>> * @vidioc_g_fbuf: pointer to the function that implements >>> @@ -422,6 +424,8 @@ struct v4l2_ioctl_ops { >>> struct v4l2_create_buffers *b); >>> int (*vidioc_prepare_buf)(struct file *file, void *fh, >>> struct v4l2_buffer *b); >>> + int (*vidioc_delete_bufs)(struct file *file, void *fh, >>> + struct v4l2_delete_buffers *d); >>> int (*vidioc_overlay)(struct file *file, void *fh, unsigned int i); >>> int (*vidioc_g_fbuf)(struct file *file, void *fh, >>> diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h >>> index 97153c69583f..e2c5ff31efd0 100644 >>> --- a/include/media/videobuf2-core.h >>> +++ b/include/media/videobuf2-core.h >>> @@ -843,6 +843,15 @@ int vb2_core_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory, >>> */ >>> int vb2_core_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb, void *pb); >>> +/** >>> + * vb2_core_delete_buf() - >>> + * @q: pointer to &struct vb2_queue with videobuf2 queue. >>> + * @vb: pointer to struct &vb2_buffer. >>> + * >>> + * Return: returns zero on success; an error code otherwise. >>> + */ >>> +int vb2_core_delete_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb); >>> + >>> /** >>> * vb2_core_qbuf() - Queue a buffer from userspace >>> * >>> diff --git a/include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h b/include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h >>> index 5a845887850b..2ef68fdf388f 100644 >>> --- a/include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h >>> +++ b/include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h >>> @@ -118,6 +118,17 @@ int vb2_create_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_create_buffers *create); >>> */ >>> int vb2_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *mdev, >>> struct v4l2_buffer *b); >>> +/** >>> + * vb2_delete_bufs() - Delete buffers from the queue >>> + * >>> + * @q: pointer to &struct vb2_queue with videobuf2 queue. >>> + * @d: delete parameter, passed from userspace to >>> + * &v4l2_ioctl_ops->vidioc_delete_bufs handler in driver >>> + * >>> + * The return values from this function are intended to be directly returned >>> + * from &v4l2_ioctl_ops->vidioc_delete_bufs handler in driver. >>> + */ >>> +int vb2_delete_bufs(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_delete_buffers *d); >> I'm missing the vb2_ioctl_delete_bufs function with a call to vb2_queue_is_busy(). >> >>> /** >>> * vb2_qbuf() - Queue a buffer from userspace >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h >>> index 78260e5d9985..9cc7f570d995 100644 >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h >>> @@ -2616,6 +2616,20 @@ struct v4l2_create_buffers { >>> __u32 reserved[6]; >>> }; >>> +/** >>> + * struct v4l2_delete_buffers - VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS argument >>> + * @index: the first buffer to be deleted >>> + * @count: number of buffers to delete >>> + * @type: enum v4l2_buf_type >>> + * @reserved: future extensions >>> + */ >>> +struct v4l2_delete_buffers { >>> + __u32 index; >>> + __u32 count; >>> + __u32 type; >>> + __u32 reserved[13]; >>> +}; >>> + >>> /* >>> * I O C T L C O D E S F O R V I D E O D E V I C E S >>> * >>> @@ -2715,6 +2729,8 @@ struct v4l2_create_buffers { >>> #define VIDIOC_DBG_G_CHIP_INFO _IOWR('V', 102, struct v4l2_dbg_chip_info) >>> #define VIDIOC_QUERY_EXT_CTRL _IOWR('V', 103, struct v4l2_query_ext_ctrl) >>> +#define VIDIOC_DELETE_BUFS _IOWR('V', 104, struct v4l2_delete_buffers) >>> + >>> /* Reminder: when adding new ioctls please add support for them to >>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-compat-ioctl32.c as well! */ >> You need much more extensive compliance checks for this, esp. mixing >> create_bufs and delete_bufs. And test it with the test-media test script. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans >> Regards, Hans