On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > On 8/24/23 08:07, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > The next question is, how do we keep it W=1 clean going forward? > > > > My plan was to fix them all, then move each warning to W=0. > > > > Arnd recently submitted a set doing just that for a bunch of them. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811140327.3754597-1-arnd@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > I like to think a bunch of this is built on top of my previous efforts. > > > > GPU is a particularly tricky though - the warnings seem to come in faster > > than I can squash them. Maybe the maintainers can find a way to test > > new patches on merge? > > I guess on that note, do you know if there is a way to run > `scripts/kernel-doc` on patches instead of whole files? That would make > much easier to block new kernel-doc issues from appearing. Not off hand. When I run builds on patches I author, I run them twice concurrently. Once on the commit I'm basing on and once on the HEAD of my patchset. I then diff the two. So as long as the number of errors and warnings stay the same or reduce, we're golden. Perhaps the same method could be used with `kernel-doc`? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
