Hi Yu, On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:52 AM Yu Liao <liaoyu15@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Prefer struct_size_t() over open-coded versions of idiom: > > sizeof(struct-with-flex-array) + sizeof(typeof-flex-array-elements) * count > > where count is the max number of items the flexible array is supposed to > contain. Thanks for the patch. Please see my comment inline. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c > index 0f430ddc1f67..c6bb88859e2a 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c > +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/frame_vector.c > @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(frame_vector_to_pfns); > struct frame_vector *frame_vector_create(unsigned int nr_frames) > { > struct frame_vector *vec; > - int size = sizeof(struct frame_vector) + sizeof(void *) * nr_frames; > + int size = struct_size_t(struct frame_vector, ptrs, nr_frames); Would struct_size() be more appropriate here, since we have vec declared above? Best regards, Tomasz > > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_frames == 0)) > return NULL; > -- > 2.25.1 >