Re: [PATCH] media: ov5640: Enable MIPI interface in ov5640_set_power_mipi()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marek

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:41:18AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 7/25/23 11:04, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hi Marek
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:22:10AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > Set OV5640_REG_IO_MIPI_CTRL00 bit 2 to 1 instead of 0, since 1 means
> > > MIPI CSI2 interface, while 0 means CPI parallel interface.
> > >
> > > In the ov5640_set_power_mipi() the interface should obviously be set
> > > to MIPI CSI2 since this functions is used to power up the sensor when
> > > operated in MIPI CSI2 mode. The sensor should not be in CPI mode in
> > > that case.
> >
> > Does this actually help fixing your 'first frame corrupted issue' ?
>
> Yes it does.
>
> > I think the logic here was to power up the interface here  in
> > ov5640_set_power_mipi() with the CSI-2 interface disabled to enter
> > LP-11 mode (something some receivers like the imx6 one are
> > particularly sensible to).
>
> Per OV5640 datasheet.
>
> Register 0x300e bit 2 selects sensor interface mode between MIPI CSI2 and
> CPI (parallel), it has nothing to do with LP modes .
>
> Register 0x3019 bits [6:4] control LP00/LP11 mode on CSI2 lines.
>
> > Then at stream time the CSI-2 interface is actually enabled in
> > ov5640_set_stream_mipi() just before streaming is started.
> >
> > Also the register documentation is very confusing and as reported in
> > ov5640_set_stream_mipi() it is also probably wrong (at least in the
> > datasheet version I have).
> >
> > I would be particularly cautious in touching this sequence as it has
> > been validated to work with multiple receivers. Of course if it
> > actually fixes an issue for you it should be taken in, but ideally, as
> > this sensor is still used in a large number of evaluation boards, it
> > should be validated by other consumers of this driver (st, imx,
> > microchip and rensas to name a few).
>
> That's quite a tall order which effectively makes it impossible to change or
> fix anything in this driver.

Really? Asking other people which use this driver to test a patch before
merging it to make sure it doesn't break their setup makes "impossibile to
change of fix anything" ?

And it's not an order of any sort, but there are a lot of users of
this driver and multiple times fixing a thing on one side breaks
things for others, I'm just trying to coordinate between multiple
developers.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux