David Ellingsworth <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I will also check your patches soon. I have this old hardware at home. >> > > The sooner the better. These patches have been waiting for review > since May. I'd rather not have to rebase them and resend them a third > time. The current review process for drivers abandoned by the original author is not working. I really, really fail too see the problem with just letting a clean compile-tested patchset like yours through after, let's say, a week without any comments at all. That's probably the only way it is ever going to be tested by someone with the actual hardware. Worst case is that some of the patches will have to be reverted in the next release (and stable point release). That's not going to be problematic at all, given that the patchset only touches a single driver in maintenance mode. Please Mauro, can you implement some sort of deadline for your review cycles? Half a year is nowhere close to acceptable for non- controversial stuff like this. Spotting the non-controversial patches is easy BTW: Just look for those with no comments at all... BjÃrn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
