Hi Conor, On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 06:16:19PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey Tommaso, > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 03:19:24PM +0200, Tommaso Merciai wrote: > > > + alliedvision,lp2hs-delay-us: > > + maximum: 150000 > > + description: | > > + Low power to high speed delay time. > > + > > + If the value is larger than 0, the camera forces a reset of all > > + D-PHY lanes for the duration specified by this property. All lanes > > + will transition to the low-power state and back to the high-speed > > + state after the delay. Otherwise the lanes will transition to and > > + remain in the high-speed state immediately after power on. > > + > > + This is meant to help CSI-2 receivers synchronizing their D-PHY > > + RX. > > Since this new version was posted before I got a chance to reply, I > still don't think it makes sense to allow 0 & then special case it, > when testing for the presence of a property is trivial. My bad, sry. My keyboard is too quick :P > The property should describe some behaviour/property of the hardware, > not be a mechanism to convey what you want to write into registers. > > I don't really get why you'd not do: > If present, the camera forces a reset of all D-PHY lanes, for the > duration specified by this property. All lanes will transition to > the low-power state and back to the high-speed state after the > delay. > Otherwise the lanes will transition to and remain in the high-speed > state immediately after power on. > You are suggesting the following solution: minimum: 1 maximum: 150000 Right? Personally I prefer to keep also 0 but never mind is ok also this solution. :) Let me know if I have understood correctly pls. Thanks in advance :) > > +static int alvium_get_dt_data(struct alvium_dev *alvium) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = &alvium->i2c_client->dev; > > + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node; > > + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint; > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + if (!node) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(dev_fwnode(dev), > > + "alliedvision,lp2hs-delay-us", > > + &alvium->lp2hs_delay); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_info(dev, "lp2hs-delay-us not found\n"); > > And this print, which I also don't understand the presence of as > well behaving driver should be quiet, goes away. Then you are suggesting to drop this print right? Thanks for your review! Regards, Tommaso > > Cheers, > Conor. > > > + > > + endpoint = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(dev_fwnode(dev), NULL); > > + if (!endpoint) { > > + dev_err(dev, "endpoint node not found\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + if (v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse(endpoint, &alvium->ep)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "could not parse endpoint\n"); > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + if (alvium->ep.bus_type != V4L2_MBUS_CSI2_DPHY) { > > + dev_err(dev, "unsupported bus type\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + if (!alvium->ep.nr_of_link_frequencies) { > > + dev_err(dev, "no link frequencies defined"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + dev_info(dev, "freq: %llu\n", > > + alvium->ep.link_frequencies[0]); > > + dev_info(dev, "lanes: %d\n", > > + alvium->ep.bus.mipi_csi2.num_data_lanes); > > + > > + return 0; > > +}