On 29/05/2023 10:50, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Add a very simple test for
> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING/VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING.
>
> We can't (at least at the moment) really know here what kind of routings
> the driver would accept, but we can test a VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING call,
> followed by a VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING call with the routing we
> received.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp | 12 ++++++++++++
> utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h | 1 +
> utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp
> index d7c10482..f082f569 100644
> --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp
> +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.cpp
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,18 @@ void testNode(struct node &node, struct node &node_m2m_cap, struct node &expbuf_
> node.is_passthrough_subdev = has_source && has_sink;
>
> if (has_routes) {
> + printf("Sub-Device routing ioctls:\n");
> +
> + for (unsigned which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY;
> + which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) {
> +
> + printf("\ttest %s VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING/VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING: %s\n",
> + which ? "Active" : "Try",
> + ok(testSubDevRouting(&node, which)));
> + }
> +
> + printf("\n");
> +
> for (unsigned which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY;
> which <= V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE; which++) {
>
> diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h
> index 0cd43980..35b2274b 100644
> --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h
> +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-compliance.h
> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ int testSubDevEnum(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned str
> int testSubDevFormat(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned stream);
> int testSubDevSelection(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigned stream);
> int testSubDevFrameInterval(struct node *node, unsigned pad, unsigned stream);
> +int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which);
>
> // Buffer ioctl tests
> int testReqBufs(struct node *node);
> diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp
> index 07192bda..962d9244 100644
> --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp
> +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-subdevs.cpp
> @@ -551,3 +551,19 @@ int testSubDevSelection(struct node *node, unsigned which, unsigned pad, unsigne
>
> return have_sel ? 0 : ENOTTY;
> }
> +
> +int testSubDevRouting(struct node *node, unsigned which)
> +{
> + struct v4l2_subdev_routing routing = {};
> + struct v4l2_subdev_route routes[256] = {};
NUM_ROUTES_MAX
> +
> + routing.which = which;
> + routing.routes = (__u64)&routes;
> + routing.num_routes = 256;
NUM_ROUTES_MAX
Regards,
Hans
> +
> + fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_ROUTING, &routing));
> +
> + fail_on_test(doioctl(node, VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_ROUTING, &routing));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
