On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 11:28:52AM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF ioctl allows to delete a buffer from a queue. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst | 1 + > .../media/v4l/vidioc-delete-buf.rst | 51 ++++++++++++++++ > .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++- > .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 6 ++ > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c | 1 + > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ioctl.c | 10 ++++ > include/media/v4l2-ioctl.h | 4 ++ > include/media/videobuf2-core.h | 9 +++ > include/media/videobuf2-v4l2.h | 11 ++++ > include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 1 + > 10 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-buf.rst > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst > index 228c1521f190..93e0a6a117fc 100644 > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/user-func.rst > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Function Reference > vidioc-dbg-g-chip-info > vidioc-dbg-g-register > vidioc-decoder-cmd > + vidioc-delete-buf > vidioc-dqevent > vidioc-dv-timings-cap > vidioc-encoder-cmd > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-buf.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-buf.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..0e7ce58f91bc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/vidioc-delete-buf.rst > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later > +.. c:namespace:: V4L > + > +.. _VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF: > + > +************************ > +ioctl VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF > +************************ > + > +Name > +==== > + > +VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF - Delete a buffer from a queue > + > +Synopsis > +======== > + > +.. c:macro:: VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF > + > +``int ioctl(int fd, VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF, struct v4l2_buffer *argp)`` > + > +Arguments > +========= > + > +``fd`` > + File descriptor returned by :c:func:`open()`. > + > +``argp`` > + Pointer to struct :c:type:`v4l2_buffer`. Would struct v4l2_create_buffers make more sense here? With it, we could actually make this ioctl VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF*S*, consistently with VIDIOC_CREATE_BUF*S* and allow the user space to remove a block of buffers the same way it created a block of buffers in the first place. > + > +Description > +=========== > + > +Applications can optionally call the :ref:`VIDIOC_DELETE_BUF` ioctl to > +delete a buffer from a queue. > + > +The struct :c:type:`v4l2_buffer` structure is specified in > +:ref:`buffer`. > + > +Return Value > +============ > + > +On success 0 is returned, on error -1 and the ``errno`` variable is set > +appropriately. The generic error codes are described at the > +:ref:`Generic Error Codes <gen-errors>` chapter. > + > +EBUSY > + File I/O is in progress. > + > +EINVAL > + The buffer ``index`` doesn't exist in the queue. > diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c > index 3c6ced360770..ec241d726fe6 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c > +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c > @@ -401,6 +401,24 @@ static void init_buffer_cache_hints(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb) > vb->skip_cache_sync_on_finish = 1; > } > > +/* > + * __vb2_queue_get_free_index() - find a free index in the queue for vb2 buffer. > + * > + * Returns an index for vb2 buffer. > + */ > +static int __vb2_queue_get_free_index(struct vb2_queue *q) > +{ > + int i; > + > + spin_lock(&q->bufs_lock); > + for (i = 0; i < q->max_num_bufs; i++) > + if (!q->bufs[i]) > + break; > + spin_unlock(&q->bufs_lock); > + > + return i; > +} Another reason to go with XArray, so that we don't have to open code index reclaim. > + > /* > * __vb2_queue_alloc() - allocate vb2 buffer structures and (for MMAP type) > * video buffer memory for all buffers/planes on the queue and initializes the > @@ -427,7 +445,7 @@ static int __vb2_queue_alloc(struct vb2_queue *q, enum vb2_memory memory, > vb->state = VB2_BUF_STATE_DEQUEUED; > vb->vb2_queue = q; > vb->num_planes = num_planes; > - vb->index = q->num_buffers + buffer; > + vb->index = __vb2_queue_get_free_index(q); > vb->type = q->type; > vb->memory = memory; > init_buffer_cache_hints(q, vb); > @@ -1570,6 +1588,45 @@ int vb2_core_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int index, void *pb) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vb2_core_prepare_buf); > > +int vb2_core_delete_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, unsigned int index) > +{ > + struct vb2_buffer *vb; > + > + vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, index); > + if (!vb) { > + dprintk(q, 1, "invalid buffer index %d\n", index); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (vb->state == VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED) { How about other states? I'd probably only allow this when the state is DEQUEUED for simplicity. Is there a need to allow deleting buffers in other states? Also, do we need to synchronize this with other contexts which could change the buffer state? > + dprintk(q, 1, "can't delete queued buffer index %d\n", index); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + Don't we also need to hold q->mmap_lock to prevent racing with an attempt to mmap the buffer? > + if (vb && vb->planes[0].mem_priv) nit: At this point it's not possible for vb to be NULL, since we already ruled that out a few lines above. > + call_void_vb_qop(vb, buf_cleanup, vb); > + > + /* Free MMAP buffers or release USERPTR buffers */ > + if (q->memory == VB2_MEMORY_MMAP) > + __vb2_buf_mem_free(vb); > + else if (q->memory == VB2_MEMORY_DMABUF) > + __vb2_buf_dmabuf_put(vb); > + else > + __vb2_buf_userptr_put(vb); > + > + vb2_queue_remove_buffer(q, vb); > + kfree(vb); > + > + q->num_buffers--; > + if (!q->num_buffers) { > + q->memory = VB2_MEMORY_UNKNOWN; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->queued_list); > + } Would it make sense to refactor __vb2_queue_free() instead to take a range of buffer indexes rather than duplicating the code here? Best regards, Tomasz