Hi,
On 2023/5/21 20:21, WANG Xuerui wrote:
+
+ If in doubt, say "N".
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/Makefile
b/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9158816ece8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+loongson-y := \
+ lsdc_benchmark.o \
+ lsdc_crtc.o \
+ lsdc_debugfs.o \
+ lsdc_device.o \
+ lsdc_drv.o \
+ lsdc_gem.o \
+ lsdc_gfxpll.o \
+ lsdc_i2c.o \
+ lsdc_irq.o \
+ lsdc_output_7a1000.o \
+ lsdc_output_7a2000.o \
+ lsdc_plane.o \
+ lsdc_pixpll.o \
+ lsdc_probe.o \
+ lsdc_ttm.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_LOONGSON) += loongson.o
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..82961531d84c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/loongson/lsdc_benchmark.c
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
Is it GPL-2.0, GPL-2.0-only, or GPL-2.0+? Please make sure all license
IDs are consistent.
I see drm/vkms is also writing the copyrights similar.
with "# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only" in the Makefile,
while "// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+" in the C source file.
Sorry, I'm stupid, I can't figure out the difference between them.
Personally, I really don't care about this as along as checkpatch.pl
don't complain.
I respect the maintainers of DRM, they didn't told me to change it.
I assume there is no problem.
