Re: [PATCH 0/4] venus: add support for 10 bit decoding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/4/2023 7:21 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 04/05/2023 14:49, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 04/05/2023 11:36, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
This series includes the changes to
   - add V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 as supported decoder format.
   - consider dpb color format while calculating buffer
     size for dpb buffers.
   - update dpb and opb color format when bit depth
     changes is detected, also update preferred color
     format to P010 in this case.

With this series, divided the previous version [1] into
multiple patches as suggested in review comments.

[1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=10376

Dikshita Agarwal (4):
   venus: add support for V4L2_PIX_FMT_P010 color format
   venus: update calculation for dpb buffers
   venus: add handling of bit depth change from firmwar
   venus: return P010 as preferred format for 10 bit decode

  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/helpers.c        | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs.h  |  3 +++
  .../media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_plat_bufs_v6.c   |  8 +++++++-
  drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/vdec.c           | 16 +++++++++++++--
  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


For future reference a series like this should:

1. Include a log of what changed between the last series and this
2. Describe which comments you addressed
    I generally try to say
    "Added newline to dts - Konrad"
    "Sent the series as a -v3 - Bryan"
    etc
3. Ideally provide a link to the previous series in

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/1682492417-20496-1-git-send-email-quic_dikshita@xxxxxxxxxxx/
4. Use versioning
    This set should be prefixed with "v2-0000-cover-letter" "v2-0001-add-support" etc

"git format-patch mybase..targettip --cover-letter -v2"

---
bod

Doh I see you did most of that - just missed the V2.

Please remember to version your subsequent series. "git format-patch -v2"

Does this qualify for a version upgrade when a single patch is subsequently raised as series ? IMO, the link

to previous single patch in cover letter and then starting the series (as v0) seems to provide the required info.


---
bod



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux