Hello, On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:30:27PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Exiting early in remove without releasing all acquired resources yields > leaks. Note that e.g. memory allocated with devm_zalloc() is freed after > .remove() returns, even if the return code was negative. > > While blocking_notifier_chain_unregister() won't fail and so the > change is somewhat cosmetic, platform driver's .remove callbacks are > about to be converted to return void. To prepare that, keep the error > message but don't return early. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I fatfingered sending out this series and this patch is a duplicate, please ignore this patch, 002/117 with the otherwise same subject is the right one. (They only differ in the number, this patch is advertised as 002 in the cover letter.) Sorry, Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
