The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpif_display.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpif_display.c b/drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpif_display.c index b2df81603f62..f8ec2991c667 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpif_display.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/ti/davinci/vpif_display.c @@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ static __init int vpif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* * vpif_remove: It un-register channels from V4L2 driver */ -static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device) +static void vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device) { struct channel_obj *ch; int i; @@ -1321,8 +1321,6 @@ static int vpif_remove(struct platform_device *device) video_unregister_device(&ch->video_dev); } free_vpif_objs(); - - return 0; } #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP @@ -1399,7 +1397,7 @@ static __refdata struct platform_driver vpif_driver = { .pm = &vpif_pm_ops, }, .probe = vpif_probe, - .remove = vpif_remove, + .remove_new = vpif_remove, }; module_platform_driver(vpif_driver); -- 2.39.2