Le 24/03/2023 à 09:52, Hans Verkuil a écrit :
On 24/03/2023 09:48, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 09:31:35AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 24/03/2023 09:11, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
Le 24/03/2023 à 06:01, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
Hi Benjamin,
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Benjamin-Gaignard/media-videobuf2-Access-vb2_queue-bufs-array-through-helper-functions/20230321-183154
base: git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321102855.346732-3-benjamin.gaignard%40collabora.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] media: videobuf2: Make bufs array dynamic allocated
config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230319 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230324/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202303240148.lKRnUqW9-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
smatch warnings:
include/media/videobuf2-core.h:1272 vb2_queue_add_buffer() warn: sleeping in atomic context
drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c:2456 vb2_core_queue_init() warn: Please consider using kcalloc instead of kmalloc_array
vim +1272 include/media/videobuf2-core.h
625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1263 static inline bool vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb)
625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1264 {
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1265 bool ret = false;
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1266
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1267 spin_lock(&q->bufs_lock);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Holding a spin lock.
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1268
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1269 if (vb->index >= q->max_num_bufs) {
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1270 struct vb2_buffer **tmp;
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1271
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 @1272 tmp = krealloc_array(q->bufs, q->max_num_bufs * 2, sizeof(*q->bufs), GFP_KERNEL);
^^^^^^^^^^
Sleeping allocation. GFP_ATOMIC? Or is there a way to move the
allocation outside the lock?
I will add GFP_ATOMIC flag in next version.
No need. Instead, don't use realloc here, just allocate a new array, copy over all
the data from the old, and then switch q->bufs with the spinlock held. Then you
can free the old one.
It's only when you update q->bufs that you need the lock.
The copy also needs to be protected by the lock.
I suspect that that is not needed, since you shouldn't be able to add buffers here
since a mutex should be held at this time.
That said, it's something that Benjamin needs to analyze.
Does using GFP_ATOMIC is problematic ?
Regards,
Hans
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1273 if (!tmp)
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1274 goto realloc_failed;
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1275
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1276 q->max_num_bufs *= 2;
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1277 q->bufs = tmp;
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1278 }
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1279
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1280 if (vb->index < q->max_num_bufs) {
625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1281 q->bufs[vb->index] = vb;
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1282 ret = true;
625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1283 }
625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1284
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1285 realloc_failed:
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1286 spin_unlock(&q->bufs_lock);
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1287
487d3f14d12ecf Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1288 return ret;
625d46c1c1fe8e Benjamin Gaignard 2023-03-21 1289 }
