On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 08:07 +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:58:18 +0200 > Hi, > > If I may resume this exchange: > > - the (microscope or device dependant) illuminators may be controlled > by v4l2, I agree. > - the status LED should be controlled by the LED interface. I agree. However, I think it is overkill based on my perception of future utilization by end users. I recommend ultimately implementing something in the v4l2 infrastructure that helps v4l2 drivers expose LEDs via the LED API easily and uniformly. Maybe that can start with a gspca framework implementation, which then evolves to the v4l2 infrastructure implementation. Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
