Re: [PATCH] Illuminators and status LED controls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Hi,
 
 >> - the status LED should be controlled by the LED interface.

 Hans> I originally was in favor of controlling these through v4l as
 Hans> well, but people made some good arguments against that. The main
 Hans> one being: why would you want to show these as a control? What is
 Hans> the end user supposed to do with them? It makes little sense.

 Hans> Frankly, why would you want to expose LEDs at all? Shouldn't this
 Hans> be completely hidden by the driver? No generic application will
 Hans> ever do anything with status LEDs anyway. So it should be the
 Hans> driver that operates them and in that case the LEDs do not need
 Hans> to be exposed anywhere.

It's not that it *HAS* to be exposed - But if we can, then it's nice to do
so as it gives flexibility to the user instead of hardcoding policy in
the kernel.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux