On 20/02/2023 15:42, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > Following v4l2 tests are failing on Linux mainline v6.2 on arm64 hikey device. > Am I missing anything in my test environment ? > > Driver Info: > ---------- > Driver name : vivid > Bus info : platform:vivid-000 > Driver version : 6.2.0 > > Fail log: > --------- > fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(325): expected 8 private controls, got 7 > test VIDIOC_QUERY_EXT_CTRL/QUERYMENU: FAIL > fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(366): qctrl.step || qctrl.minimum || > qctrl.maximum || qctrl.default_value > test VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL: FAIL > .. > fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(473): g_ctrl returned an error (22) > test VIDIOC_G/S_CTRL: FAIL > .. > fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(593): returned control value out of range > fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(706): invalid control 0098f90f > test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: FAIL > .. > fail: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(264): fmtdesc.description mismatch: > was 'Y/UV 4:2:0', expected 'Y/CbCr 4:2:0' This suggests that you are running with an old(er) v4l-utils version, since I adapted v4l2-compliance to avoid this failure. It's due to a change in the kernel, so currently both old and new descriptions are accepted. Looking at the logs: v4l2-compliance SHA: 5d8c459c1bf9 2021-04-08 13:28:26 That's much too old. Regards, Hans > test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: FAIL > > > Test details, > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.2/testrun/14859062/suite/v4l2-compliance/tests/ > https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.2/testrun/14859062/suite/v4l2-compliance/test/VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT-FRAMESIZES-FRAMEINTERVALS/log > > -- > Linaro LKFT > https://lkft.linaro.org
