On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> MIPI DisCo for Imaging defines properties for sensor-adjacent devices such
> as EEPROM, LED flash or lens VCM as either device or sub-node references.
> This is compliant with existing DT definitions apart from property names.
>
> Rename parsed MIPI-defined properties so drivers will have a unified view
> of them as defined in DT and already parsed by drivers. This can be done
> in-place as the MIPI-defined property strings are always longer than the
> DT one. This also results in loss of constness in parser function
> arguments.
>
> Individual bindings to devices could define the references differently
> between MIPI DisCo for Imaging and DT, in terms of device or sub-node
> references. This will still need to be handled in the drivers themselves.
...
> +void acpi_properties_prepare_mipi(union acpi_object *elements)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /* Replace MIPI DisCo for Imaging property names with DT equivalents. */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mipi_disco_props); i++) {
> + if (!strcmp(mipi_disco_props[i].mipi_prop,
> + elements[0].string.pointer)) {
/* const ? */ char *e0 = elements[0].string.pointer;
...
if (!strcmp(mipi_disco_props[i].mipi_prop, e0)) {
> + WARN_ON(strscpy(elements[0].string.pointer,
> + mipi_disco_props[i].dt_prop,
> + elements[0].string.length) < 0);
WARN_ON(strscpy(e0, mipi_disco_props[i].dt_prop,
elements[0].string.pointer) < 0);
?
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
