The logic in ir_timer_keyup was inverted. In case that values aren't equal, the meaning of the time_is_after_eq_jiffies(ir->keyup_jiffies) is that ir->keyup_jiffies is after the the jiffies or equally that that jiffies are before the the ir->keyup_jiffies which is exactly the situation we want to avoid (that the timeout is in the future) Confusing Eh? Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c b/drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c index 0917535..a8fd777 100644 --- a/drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c +++ b/drivers/media/IR/ir-keytable.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static void ir_timer_keyup(unsigned long cookie) * a keyup event might follow immediately after the keydown. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&ir->keylock, flags); - if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(ir->keyup_jiffies)) + if (time_is_before_eq_jiffies(ir->keyup_jiffies)) ir_keyup(ir); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ir->keylock, flags); } -- 1.7.0.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
