> Overall, how much support do we still have upstream for H3 ES1.x, and do > we need to keep it ? H3 ES.1x is relatively old, does someone still rely > on it ? SDHI also had numerous problems with H3 ES1. The agreement was: If it is "easily" upstreamable, then we want to support ES1 as much as possible. If it is complex and a maintenance burden, then we don't upstream it. This is why ES1 has no HS400 support for eMMC. It would have involved activating the SDHI sequencer which we don't use otherwise. I copied this behaviour and think it makes sense (for upstream).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
