Hi Krzysztof, On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16/01/2023 12:38, Michael Tretter wrote: > > Convert the bindings of the Freescale Pixel Pipeline to YAML. > > > > The conversion drops the previously listed compatibles for several SoCs. > > It is unclear, if the PXP on these SoCs is compatible to any of the PXPs > > on the existing SoCs and would allow to reuse the already defined > > compatibles. The missing compatibles should be brought back when the > > support for the PXP on these SoCs is added. > > > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changelog: > > > > v2: > > > > - add fsl,imx6sll-pxp and fsl,imx6sx-pxp compatibles > > - restrict number of interrupts per variant > > - cleanup syntax > > > > v2.1: > > > > - use enum for compatibles > > - add power-domains property > > - fix syntax for specifying the required number of interrupts > > - fix number of interrupts for fsl,imx6ul-pxp > > Attaching some half-baked patch to existing thread is not the way. It > might not be supported by workflows at all (b4, patchwork), it messes > with threads. Don't do it. Send a v3 of entire patchset once you collect > proper feedback. This is the only patch in the series that required a new version, and I've asked Michael to resubmit it alone to avoid spamming all the recipients. > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. I'll take the whole series in my tree and send a pull request for v6.3. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
