Re: [PATCH] media: uvcvideo: Force UVC version to 1.0a for 0408:4035

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kolbjørn

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 15:16, Kolbjørn Jetne <kolbjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have no idea about the reason for being involved in this conversation...
My bad

I tried finding the email of this user:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2000947/comments/22

and I thought it was you. Sorry about that!

>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Kolbjørn Jetne
> Daglig leder
> +47 957 45 096
>
> KODEMAKER
> www.kodemaker.no
>
>
> man. 16. jan. 2023 kl. 15:12 skrev Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Hi Ricardo,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 02:05:28PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
>> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 at 21:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The Quanta ACER HD User Facing camera reports a UVC 1.50 version, but
>> > > implements UVC 1.0a as shown by the UVC probe control being 26 bytes
>> > > long. Force the UVC version for that device.
>> >
>> > Don't we also want to include 4035:4033 ?
>>
>> I've asked for the lsusb output for that device, I'll send a separate
>> patch when I get it.
>>
>> > I am curious about the PowerLine Control (does it have one?) will it
>> > behave like 1.1 or 1.5
>>
>> Good question. Hardcoding the version to 1.0a will not cause an error,
>> but may prevent the auto mode from being supported.
>>
>> An alternative would be to automatically fall back to the UVC 1.0a video
>> probe and commit control when the size returned by GET_CUR differs from
>> the value expected from UVC 1.5. That would be a generic fix that won't
>> require quirks. What do you think ?
>>
>> > Would it be possible to get the output with uvc_debug enabled?
>>
>> I'll let you tell Giuliano how to provide that :-)
>>
>> > > Reported-by: Giuliano Lotta <giuliano.lotta@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > ---
>> > >
>> > > Giuliano, I believe you've successfully tested this patch. If so, could
>> > > you reply with a Tested-by tag ? Just copying the following in your
>> > > reply will do:
>> > >
>> > > Tested-by: Giuliano Lotta <giuliano.lotta@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > >
>> > >  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> > >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
>> > > index 1a186abeb4fa..742eeaff333e 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_driver.c
>> > > @@ -2429,6 +2429,17 @@ static const struct usb_device_id uvc_ids[] = {
>> > >           .bInterfaceSubClass   = 1,
>> > >           .bInterfaceProtocol   = UVC_PC_PROTOCOL_15,
>> > >           .driver_info          = (kernel_ulong_t)&uvc_ctrl_power_line_limited },
>> > > +       /* Quanta ACER HD User Facing */
>> > > +       { .match_flags          = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE
>> > > +                               | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO,
>> > > +         .idVendor             = 0x0408,
>> > > +         .idProduct            = 0x4035,
>> > > +         .bInterfaceClass      = USB_CLASS_VIDEO,
>> > > +         .bInterfaceSubClass   = 1,
>> > > +         .bInterfaceProtocol   = UVC_PC_PROTOCOL_15,
>> > > +         .driver_info          = (kernel_ulong_t)&(const struct uvc_device_info){
>> > > +               .uvc_version = 0x010a,
>> > > +         } },
>> > >         /* LogiLink Wireless Webcam */
>> > >         { .match_flags          = USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_DEVICE
>> > >                                 | USB_DEVICE_ID_MATCH_INT_INFO,
>> > >
>> > > base-commit: fd957081cff04668f390c6f290bdcc7fc009a0f1
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Laurent Pinchart



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux