On 16/01/2023 10:14, Moudy Ho (何宗原) wrote:
>>> + mdp3-fg0@14002000 {
>>
>> Node names should be generic.
>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html*generic-names-recommendation__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!gmuIIk9pHTEGcVTtOXNeP3a8XUucoiTd5vTmxNK8lCHtytRDc3R8Eh44WOWNEUkJlv_pPCtg_DvPCHsCHNscg6_0cfJe$ ;
>>
>>
>> "0" suffix is definitely nothing generic. Drop such suffixes
>> everywhere.
>> Drop also "mdp3" prefix everywhere.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> May I uniformly name all MediaTek's media data path ver.3(MDP3) nodes
> as "mdp3@xxx"?
No, because it does not describe generic class of a device. Some nodes
are probably quite specific, thus we do not have generic names for them,
but then any prefixes are also not neeeded. If node is image-scaler, it
is just image-scaler, not "mdp3-image-scaler". If node is video-codec it
is not mdp3-video-codec. etc.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
