On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 01:14:59PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Umang,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 02:14:04PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote:
> > Create a proper per device platorm_device structure for all the child
> > devices that needs to be registered by vchiq platform driver. Replace
> > the vchiq_register_child() with platform_add_devices() to register the
> > child devices.
>
> This explains what the patch does, but not why.
>
> > This is part of an effort to address TODO item "Get rid of all non
> > essential global structures and create a proper per device structure"
>
> And this explains part of the reason only. Could you please expand the
> commit message with the reasoning behind this change ? It's not clear
> from the change below why this is needed and good.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 59 ++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > index 22de23f3af02..fa42ea3791a7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > @@ -65,8 +65,29 @@ int vchiq_susp_log_level = VCHIQ_LOG_ERROR;
> > DEFINE_SPINLOCK(msg_queue_spinlock);
> > struct vchiq_state g_state;
> >
> > -static struct platform_device *bcm2835_camera;
> > -static struct platform_device *bcm2835_audio;
> > +static u64 vchiq_device_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>
> The fact that this isn't const and is used by two different
> platform_device instances is worrying. Either it can be made const, or
> it's wrong.
>
> > +
> > +static struct platform_device bcm2835_camera = {
> > + .name = "bcm2835-camera",
> > + .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > + .dev = {
> > + .dma_mask = &vchiq_device_dmamask,
> > + }
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_device bcm2835_audio = {
> > + .name = "bcm2835_audio",
> > + .id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> > + .dev = {
> > + .dma_mask = &vchiq_device_dmamask,
> > + }
> > +
>
> Extra blank line.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct platform_device *vchiq_devices[] __initdata = {
>
> Make it const.
>
> > + &bcm2835_camera,
> > + &bcm2835_audio,
> > +};
> >
> > struct vchiq_drvdata {
> > const unsigned int cache_line_size;
> > @@ -1763,28 +1784,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id vchiq_of_match[] = {
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vchiq_of_match);
> >
> > -static struct platform_device *
> > -vchiq_register_child(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *name)
> > -{
> > - struct platform_device_info pdevinfo;
> > - struct platform_device *child;
> > -
> > - memset(&pdevinfo, 0, sizeof(pdevinfo));
> > -
> > - pdevinfo.parent = &pdev->dev;
> > - pdevinfo.name = name;
> > - pdevinfo.id = PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE;
> > - pdevinfo.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> > -
> > - child = platform_device_register_full(&pdevinfo);
> > - if (IS_ERR(child)) {
> > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s not registered\n", name);
> > - child = NULL;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return child;
> > -}
> > -
> > static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device_node *fw_node;
> > @@ -1832,8 +1831,11 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > goto error_exit;
> > }
> >
> > - bcm2835_camera = vchiq_register_child(pdev, "bcm2835-camera");
> > - bcm2835_audio = vchiq_register_child(pdev, "bcm2835_audio");
> > + err = platform_add_devices(vchiq_devices, ARRAY_SIZE(vchiq_devices));
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add vchiq child devices");
> > + goto error_exit;
> > + }
>
> If you unbind and rebind this driver, the platform_device instances
> defined as global variables will be reused, and I'm pretty sure that
> will cause issues, for instance with the kobj->state_initialized check
> in kobject_init() (called from device_initialize(), itself called from
> platform_device_register(), from platform_add_devices()). I'm not sure
> static instances of platform_device are a very good idea in general.
static instances of any device are a horrible idea, but it seems that
many drivers do this and abuse platform devices this way :(
Ideally this should be done properly, with the correct devices created
automatically based on the device tree structure, NOT hard-coded into a
.c file like this.
So I too really do not like this change, why are these not being created
by the firware layer automatically?
thanks,
greg k-h
