Hello,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:06:20AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:04:14 +0300
> > Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, August 26, 2010 08:40:47 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:50:12 +0300
> > > > Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Friday, August 20, 2010 11:35:06 am FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:13:45 +0300
> > > > > > Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This tric is already used in drivers/staging/dt3155v4l.c
> > > > > > > > > dt3155_alloc_coherent()/dt3155_free_coherent()
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Here proposed for general use by popular demand from video4linux folks.
> > > > > > > > > Helps for videobuf-dma-contig framework.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > What you guys exactly want to do? If you just want to pre-allocate
> > > > > > > > coherent memory for latter usage,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, just to preallocate not coherent, but rather contiguous memory for latter usage.
> > > > > > > We use coherent memory because it turns out to be contiguous.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hmm, you don't care about coherency? You just need contiguous memory?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes. We just need contiguous memory. Coherency is important as far as when dma
> > > > > transfer finishes user land is able to see the new data. Could be done by something like
> > > > > dma_{,un}map_single()
> > > >
> > > > Then, we should avoid using coherent memory as I exaplained before. In
> > > > addition, dma_alloc_coherent can't provide large enough contigous
> > > > memory for some drivers so this patch doesn't help much.
> > >
> > > Please, look at drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-contig.c. Using coherent memory
> > > is inavoidable for now, there is no alternative for it for now. The two new functions,
> > > which I propose are just helpers for those of us who already use coherent memory
> > > (via videobuf-dma-contig API). May be adding these two functions to
> > > drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-contig.c will be better solution?
> >
> > If you add something to the videobuf-dma-contig API, that's fine by me
> > because drivers/media/video/videobuf-dma-contig.c uses the own
> > structure and plays with dma_alloc_coherent. As long as a driver
> > doesn't touch device->dma_mem directly, it's fine, I think (that is,
> > dt3155v4l driver is broken). There are already some workarounds for
> > contigous memory in several drivers anyway.
>
> No, this will not work - this API has to be used from board code and
> videobuf can be built modular.
>
> > We will have the proper API for contiguous memory. I don't think that
> > adding such workaround to the DMA API is a good idea.
>
> We have currently a number of boards broken in the mainline. They must be
> fixed for 2.6.36. I don't think the mentioned API will do this for us. So,
> as I suggested earlier, we need either this or my patch series
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/8595
this seems to be more mature to me. The original patch in this thread
uses a symbol DT3155_COH_FLAGS which seems misplaced in generic code and
doesn't put the new functions in a header.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
