On 24/11/2022 12:05, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 05/10/2022 13:58, Allen-KH Cheng (程冠勳) wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 09:30 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 05/10/2022 09:21, Allen-KH Cheng (程冠勳) wrote: >>>> Hi Rob, >>>> >>>> On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 17:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 07:22:36PM +0800, Allen-KH Cheng wrote: >>>>>> In order to make the names of the child nodes more generic, we >>>>>> rename >>>>>> "vcodec" to "video-codec" for decoder in patternProperties and >>>>>> example. >>>>> >>>>> They are either generic or they aren't. Until something generic >>>>> is >>>>> defined, I don't think it's worth the churn to change. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < >>>>>> angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> .../bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-subdev-decoder.yaml | 8 >>>>>> ++++---- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git >>>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec- >>>>>> subdev- >>>>>> decoder.yaml >>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec- >>>>>> subdev- >>>>>> decoder.yaml >>>>>> index c4f20acdc1f8..67fde48f991c 100644 >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec- >>>>>> subdev-decoder.yaml >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec- >>>>>> subdev-decoder.yaml >>>>>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ properties: >>>>>> >>>>>> # Required child node: >>>>>> patternProperties: >>>>>> - '^vcodec-lat@[0-9a-f]+$': >>>>>> + '^video-codec-lat@[0-9a-f]+$': >>>>> >>>>> Just 'video-codec' doesn't work? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your reply. >>>> >>>> hmm, I think 'vidoe-codec' does wrok. >>>> >>>> There are two seperate hardwares for the MTK video codec. >>>> codec-lat and codec-core. >>>> >>>> Is it ok to keep two child node names for various hardwares? >>>> >>> >>> Aren't they still codecs? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Krzysztof >> >> Yes, They are both hardware deocders. Lat is responsible for the >> bitstream and write the outcome to the lat buffer. Core will decode the >> lat buffer and write the outcome to the output buffer. Each frame will >> be decoded cyclically by these two hardware deocders. > > So is this patch OK to be merged? Or do you still want changes? The patch should be changed as Rob pointed out - use "video-codec" name. Best regards, Krzysztof