Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 22. November 2022, 23:32:50 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > There's no need to check for an incorrect number of data lanes in
> > imx290_set_data_lanes() as the value is validated at probe() time. Drop
> > the check.
> >
> > The PHY_LANE_NUM and CSI_LANE_MODE registers are programmed with a value
> > equal to the number of lanes minus one. Compute it instead of handling
> > it in the switch/case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c | 17 +++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> > index 4dfa090f918d..369db35a7afd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx290.c
> > @@ -512,28 +512,21 @@ static int imx290_set_register_array(struct imx290
> > *imx290,
> >
> > static int imx290_set_data_lanes(struct imx290 *imx290)
> > {
> > - int ret = 0, laneval, frsel;
> > + int ret = 0;
>
> You can remove ret and make function returning void as well as there
> (currently) is no error handling at all. The current single caller also
> ignores the return value.
There's error handling in this function, in the imx290_write() calls.
The ret variable should stay at least for that. As for making the
function void, I would rather fix the caller. I'll add a patch for that
in v2.
> > + u32 frsel;
> >
> > switch (imx290->nlanes) {
> > case 2:
> > - laneval = 0x01;
> > + default:
> > frsel = 0x02;
> > break;
> > case 4:
> > - laneval = 0x03;
> > frsel = 0x01;
> > break;
> > - default:
> > - /*
> > - * We should never hit this since the data lane count is
> > - * validated in probe itself
> > - */
> > - dev_err(imx290->dev, "Lane configuration not supported\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > - imx290_write(imx290, IMX290_PHY_LANE_NUM, laneval, &ret);
> > - imx290_write(imx290, IMX290_CSI_LANE_MODE, laneval, &ret);
> > + imx290_write(imx290, IMX290_PHY_LANE_NUM, imx290->nlanes - 1, &ret);
> > + imx290_write(imx290, IMX290_CSI_LANE_MODE, imx290->nlanes - 1, &ret);
> > imx290_write(imx290, IMX290_FR_FDG_SEL, frsel, &ret);
> >
> > return ret;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
