On 09/11/2022 04:55, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> commit "752d3a23d1f68de87e3c" which adds MFC codec device node
> for exynos3250 SoC. Since exynos3250.dtsi and exynos5420.dtsi are
> using same compatible string as "samsung,mfc-v7" but their
> node properties are different.As both SoCs have MFC v7 hardware
> module but with different clock hierarchy and complexity.
> So renaming compatible string from version specific to SoC based.
>
> Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (git log --oneline -- ...).
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> index 326b9e0ed8d3..98105c64f7d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi
> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
> };
>
> mfc: codec@13400000 {
> - compatible = "samsung,mfc-v7";
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-mfc";
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Best regards,
Krzysztof
