Hi On 02.11.2022 14:06, Aakarsh Jain wrote: > Exynos3250 uses the same compatible as Exynos5420, but both > the MFC IPs found in these SoC are different interms of clock > property. So using same compatible for both SoC is not correct. > Lets have a separate compatible for Exynos3250 and Exynos5420 > to differentiate these SoCs. > > Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx> Minor issue, Exynos3250 is based on ARM 32bit not ARM 64bit (see the patch subject). > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > We are already in process of converting this txt file to yaml. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/ > 20221011122516.32135-2-aakarsh.jain@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > modifying this txt binding for completeness. > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt > index aa54c8159d9f..4ff1898e5a51 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt > @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ Required properties: > (a) "samsung,mfc-v5" for MFC v5 present in Exynos4 SoCs > (b) "samsung,mfc-v6" for MFC v6 present in Exynos5 SoCs > (c) "samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7 present in Exynos5420 SoC > - (d) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC > - (e) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC > - (f) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC > + (d) "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for MFC v7 present in Exynos3250 SoC > + (e) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC > + (f) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC > + (g) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC > > - reg : Physical base address of the IP registers and length of memory > mapped region. Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland
