Hi Sakari,
Thank you for the review.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 8:18 PM Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:34:56PM +0100, Prabhakar wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Switch to using runtime PM for power management.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1->v2
> > * Moved pm_runtime_*_autosuspend() calls after registering the subdev.
> > ---
<snip>
> > @@ -795,7 +773,7 @@ static int ov5645_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> > int ret;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&ov5645->power_lock);
> > - if (!ov5645->power_count) {
> > + if (!pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(ov5645->dev)) {
> > mutex_unlock(&ov5645->power_lock);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -827,6 +805,7 @@ static int ov5645_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(ov5645->dev);
>
> I think you'll need pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() before this. I missed this
> on the last round. Maybe in probe() too. Feel free to resend just this
> patch.
>
Agreed, I'll respin this patch fixing the above.
Cheers,
Prabhakar
