Hi Simon, On 10/5/22 14:12, Simon Ser wrote: > According to CVT 2.0 table 3-2, C_CLOCK_STEP = 0.001 for both > RBv2 and RBv3. Another nice catch! Thank you, Hans > > Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > calc-gtf-cvt.cpp | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/calc-gtf-cvt.cpp b/calc-gtf-cvt.cpp > index dc22ad535135..6330bb7ac814 100644 > --- a/calc-gtf-cvt.cpp > +++ b/calc-gtf-cvt.cpp > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ timings edid_state::calc_cvt_mode(unsigned h_pixels, unsigned v_lines, > double interlace = int_rqd ? 0.5 : 0; > double total_active_pixels = h_pixels_rnd + hor_margin * 2; > double v_field_rate_rqd = int_rqd ? ip_freq_rqd * 2 : ip_freq_rqd; > - double clock_step = rb == RB_CVT_V2 ? 0.001 : 0.25; > + double clock_step = rb >= RB_CVT_V2 ? 0.001 : 0.25; > double h_blank = (rb == RB_CVT_V1 || (rb == RB_CVT_V3 && alt)) ? 160 : 80; > double rb_v_fporch = rb == RB_CVT_V1 ? 3 : 1; > double refresh_multiplier = (rb == RB_CVT_V2 && alt) ? 1000.0 / 1001.0 : 1;
