Hi Simon,
On 10/4/22 14:54, Simon Ser wrote:
> The spec uses the word "bezel", not "bevel".
Nice catch! I've applied the patch.
Thank you,
Hans
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> parse-displayid-block.cpp | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/parse-displayid-block.cpp b/parse-displayid-block.cpp
> index a754483b3b73..6dddad37584d 100644
> --- a/parse-displayid-block.cpp
> +++ b/parse-displayid-block.cpp
> @@ -1027,20 +1027,20 @@ void edid_state::parse_displayid_tiled_display_topology(const unsigned char *x,
> printf(" Tile resolution: %ux%u\n", tile_width + 1, tile_height + 1);
> if (caps & 0x40) {
> if (pix_mult) {
> - printf(" Top bevel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> + printf(" Top bezel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> pix_mult * x[12] / 10.0);
> - printf(" Bottom bevel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> + printf(" Bottom bezel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> pix_mult * x[13] / 10.0);
> - printf(" Right bevel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> + printf(" Right bezel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> pix_mult * x[14] / 10.0);
> - printf(" Left bevel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> + printf(" Left bezel size: %.1f pixels\n",
> pix_mult * x[15] / 10.0);
> } else {
> - fail("No bevel information, but the pixel multiplier is non-zero.\n");
> + fail("No bezel information, but the pixel multiplier is non-zero.\n");
> }
> printf(" Tile resolution: %ux%u\n", tile_width + 1, tile_height + 1);
> } else if (pix_mult) {
> - fail("No bevel information, but the pixel multiplier is non-zero.\n");
> + fail("No bezel information, but the pixel multiplier is non-zero.\n");
> }
> if (is_v2)
> printf(" Tiled Display Manufacturer/Vendor ID: %02X-%02X-%02X\n",
