On Sat, 1 Oct 2022, Irui Wang wrote: > when enable multi-core encoding, encoder cores use their own clock, > refactor clock management functions with used encoder hardware id. > > Signed-off-by: Irui Wang <irui.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++--- > .../mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.h | 6 +- > .../platform/mediatek/vcodec/venc_drv_if.c | 4 +- > 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c > index 213c3f50e9eb..2f83aade779a 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mediatek/vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_pm.c > @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_vcodec_init_enc_clk); > static int mtk_enc_core_power_on(struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx) > { > struct mtk_venc_hw_dev *sub_core; > + struct mtk_vcodec_clk *clk; > int ret, i; > + int j = 0; > > /* multi-core encoding need power on all available cores */ > for (i = 0; i < MTK_VENC_HW_MAX; i++) { > @@ -73,12 +75,27 @@ static int mtk_enc_core_power_on(struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx) > mtk_v4l2_err("power on sub_core[%d] fail %d", i, ret); > goto pm_on_fail; > } > + > + clk = &sub_core->pm.venc_clk; > + for (j = 0; j < clk->clk_num; j++) { > + ret = clk_prepare(clk->clk_info[j].vcodec_clk); > + if (ret) { > + mtk_v4l2_err("prepare clk [%s] fail %d", > + clk->clk_info[j].clk_name, ret); > + goto pm_on_fail; > + } > + } > } > return ret; > > pm_on_fail: > for (i -= 1; i >= 0; i--) { > sub_core = (struct mtk_venc_hw_dev *)ctx->dev->enc_hw_dev[i]; > + > + clk = &sub_core->pm.venc_clk; > + for (j -= 1; j >= 0; j--) > + clk_unprepare(clk->clk_info[j].vcodec_clk); > + > pm_runtime_put_sync(&sub_core->plat_dev->dev); There's more than one thing wrong here. pm_runtime_put_sync() won't be called for the ith entry when the later goto pm_on_fail is taken because the loop decrements i right at the start. Similarly, i and j will mismatch for the ith entry because i was decremented. Third, j does not start from clk->clk_num - 1 for the other entries (for those lower "i"s). -- i.